Back
 Add

Compare:

SCENIC NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC VS NEW MARK CARE CENTER

Overview:

There are 46 differences and 26 similarities between SCENIC NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC, NEW MARK CARE CENTER

General
City
Herculaneum Kansas City
State attribute explanation
Mo Mo
Street
1333 Scenic Drive 11221 North Nashua Drive
Zip Code
63,048 64,155
Phone
6,369,312,995 8,167,344,433
Overall Star Rating
4
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
3
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
2
RN Only Star Rating
2
3
Number of Certified Beds
186
199
Total Number of Residents
135
175
Percent of Occupied Beds
73 %
88 %
Health Survey Date
1/24/2012 9/22/2011
Fire Survey Date
1/24/2012 9/22/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Partnership For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No No
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
75.2
# of deficiencies
6
4
Staff Information
Number of Residents
135
175
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.5 - 2.0
0.66
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.82
0.86
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.32
1.51
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11
0.09
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11
0.09
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely.survey Date: 03/11/2010date Of Correction: 04/07/2010
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 09/15/2009date Of Correction: 10/16/2009
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 06/11/2009date Of Correction: 07/29/2009
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.survey Date: 04/06/2011date Of Correction: 05/11/2011 Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 06/11/2009date Of Correction: 07/29/2009
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 08/25/2010date Of Correction: 10/08/2010
Deficiency #3
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give The Right Treatment And Services To Residents Who Have Mental Or Psychosocial Problems Adjusting.survey Date: 03/15/2010date Of Correction: 04/15/2010
Deficiency #4
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 10/08/2009date Of Correction: 11/20/2009
Deficiency #5
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 10/08/2009date Of Correction: 11/20/2009
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep The Rate Of Medication Errors (wrong Drug, Wrong Dose, Wrong Time) To Less Than 5%.survey Date: 10/08/2009date Of Correction: 11/20/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
35.8 %
18.1:1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
2.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.7 %
24.3 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.5 %
9.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.1 / 8.8
7.7 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
36.2 %
24.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.8 %
5.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.5 %
6.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.6 %
12.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
12.5 %
1.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.7 %
16.3:1
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.1 %
81.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95.8 %
91.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.9 %
3.8 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33.4 %
17.8:1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
2.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.4 %
24.8 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.6 %
8.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.1 %
8.2 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
39.2 %
32.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.9 %
5.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.3 %
5.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.8 %
9.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
13.4 %
1.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.5 %
4.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.6-28
18.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
67.8 %
78.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
89 %
88.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
15.3 %
0.5 - 2.0

saved