Back
 Add

Compare:

STUART NURSING & RESTORATIVE CARE CENTER VS TITUSVILLE REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER

Overview:

There are 53 differences and 23 similarities between STUART NURSING & RESTORATIVE CARE CENTER, TITUSVILLE REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER

General
City
Stuart Titusville
State attribute explanation
Fl Fl
Street
1500 Palm Beach Rd 1705 Jess Parrish Ct
Zip Code
34,994 32,796
Phone
7,722,835,887 3,212,695,720
Overall Star Rating
2
2
Health Inspections Star Rating
1
1
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
4
RN Only Star Rating
4
4
Number of Certified Beds
120
157
Total Number of Residents
93
109
Percent of Occupied Beds
78 %
69 %
Health Survey Date
3/30/2012 2/3/2012
Fire Survey Date
3/29/2012 2/2/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation Non Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No Yes
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
3
# of deficiencies
13
Staff Information
Number of Residents
93
112
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.68
0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.12
0.93
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.81
1.7
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09
0.05
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09
0.05
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 03/21/2012date Of Correction: 04/21/2012
Deficiency #2
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.survey Date: 11/09/2011date Of Correction: 11/15/2011
Deficiency #3
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 11/09/2011date Of Correction: 11/15/2011
Deficiency #4
Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 03/01/2011date Of Correction: 04/01/2011
Deficiency #5
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Clean Bed And Bath Linens That Are In Good Condition.survey Date: 12/21/2010date Of Correction: 01/30/2011
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Properly Hold, Secure And Manage Each Resident's Personal Money Which Is Deposited With The Nursing Home.survey Date: 03/21/2012date Of Correction: 04/21/2012
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.survey Date: 12/21/2010date Of Correction: 01/30/2011
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 11/09/2011date Of Correction: 11/15/2011
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 12/21/2010date Of Correction: 01/30/2011
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 11/09/2011date Of Correction: 11/15/2011
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 11/09/2011date Of Correction: 11/15/2011
Deficiency #2
Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Choose A Doctor To Serve As The Medical Director To Create Resident Care Policies And Coordinate Medical Care In The Facility.survey Date: 03/01/2011date Of Correction: 04/01/2011
Deficiency #3
Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 03/01/2011date Of Correction: 04/01/2011
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33.7 %
35.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.8 %
1.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.8:1
4.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.6 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.7 %
8.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
65.2 %
25 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.6 %
4.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11 %
3.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.1 %
8.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.7 %
40 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.1 %
96.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
88.7 %
94.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
1.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3 %
75.2 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33 %
32 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.4 %
0.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.3 %
5.7 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5 %
2.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.1 / 8.8
7.3 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
67.5 %
25.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4 %
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.9 / 9.9
4.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
0.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.1 %
8.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3 %
0.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.1 %
36.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.2 %
95.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
88.2 %
95 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
35.5 %
18.4 %

saved