Back
 Add

Compare:

THE COTTAGES AT BRUSHY CREEK VS LILA DOYLE AT OCONEE MEDICAL CENTER

Overview:

There are 49 differences and 20 similarities between THE COTTAGES AT BRUSHY CREEK, LILA DOYLE AT OCONEE MEDICAL CENTER

General
City
Greer Seneca
State attribute explanation
Sc Sc
Street
101 Cottage Creek Circle 101 Lila Doyle Drive
Zip Code
29,650 29,672
Phone
8,647,978,800 8,648,857,675
Overall Star Rating
2
1
Health Inspections Star Rating
1
1
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
3
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
2
RN Only Star Rating
4
3
Number of Certified Beds
144
120
Total Number of Residents
143
116
Percent of Occupied Beds
99 %
97 %
Health Survey Date
5/18/2011 11/30/2011
Fire Survey Date
5/18/2011 12/1/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation Non Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
Yes Yes
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No No
Resident and Family Councils
Both Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No No
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
1
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
1
# of deficiencies
6
Staff Information
Number of Residents
143
116
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.82
0.66
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.29
0.93
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.11
1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.13
0.11
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.13
0.11
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 02/14/2011date Of Correction: 03/16/2011
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 01/17/2012date Of Correction: 02/17/2012
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 01/17/2012date Of Correction: 02/17/2012
Deficiency #3
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 02/14/2011date Of Correction: 03/16/2011
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 04/07/2011date Of Correction: 05/07/2011
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.survey Date: 01/17/2012date Of Correction: 02/17/2012
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12 %
19.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9 %
1.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.4 / 10.4
15.1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.3 %
5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.2 %
14.6 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
61 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.9 %
3.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
12.3:1
10.1:1
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.7 %
2.20 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.5 %
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.8 %
29.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.5 %
95.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.6 %
96.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
0.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
9.2 %
5.6:1
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.2 %
22.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.3 %
2.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.2-20
15.1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.1 %
6.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11 %
9 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
44.6 %
57.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.9 %
2.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.9 %
8.6:1
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.4 %
0.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.3 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
9.8 %
5.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.5 %
31.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.6 %
93.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.7 %
93.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
23.7 (74.7)
22.8 %

saved