General
City		Old Saybrook	vs	Watertown
	[X] Add Comment about “City”
State attribute explanation		Ct	vs	Ct
	[X] Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”
Street		1775 Boston Post Rd	vs	35 Bunker Hill Rd
	[X] Add Comment about “Street”
Zip Code		6,475	vs	6,795
	[X] Add Comment about “Zip Code”
Phone		8,603,996,216	vs	8,602,745,428
	[X] Add Comment about “Phone”
Overall Star Rating		3	vs	4
	[X] Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”
Health Inspections Star Rating		3	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”
Nurse Staffing Star Rating		2	vs	4
	[X] Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”
Quality Measures Star Rating		3	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”
RN Only Star Rating		2	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”
Number of Certified Beds		120	vs	110
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”
Total Number of Residents		109	vs	99
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”
Percent of Occupied Beds		91 %	vs	90 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”
Health Survey Date		8/26/2011	vs	5/26/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”
Fire Survey Date		8/26/2011	vs	5/26/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”
Sprinkler Status		Fully Sprinklered	vs	Fully Sprinklered
	[X] Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”
Program Participation		Medicare And Medicaid	vs	Medicare And Medicaid
	[X] Add Comment about “Program Participation”
Type of Ownership		For Profit - Corporation	vs	For Profit - Corporation
	[X] Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”
Located Within a Hospital?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?		Yes	vs	Yes
	[X] Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”
Resident and Family Councils		Resident	vs	Resident
	[X] Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”
Continuing Care Retirement Community?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”
Quality Indicator Survey?		Yes	vs	Yes
	[X] Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”
Special Focus Facility?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”
Civil Money Penalty Count		75.2	vs	1
	[X] Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”
Total Enforcement Actions Count		75.2	vs	1
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”
# of deficiencies		8	vs	6
	[X] Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Staff Information
Number of Residents		109	vs	99
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Residents”
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.44	vs	0.59
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.82	vs	0.72
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day		1.26	vs	1.31
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.07	vs	0.16
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.07	vs	0.16
	[X] Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 05/26/2011date Of Correction: 07/07/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 10/29/2010date Of Correction: 12/10/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”
Deficiency #3			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 10/29/2010date Of Correction: 12/10/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 10/14/2009date Of Correction: 11/25/2009	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 04/16/2012date Of Correction: 05/23/2012	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 05/26/2011date Of Correction: 07/07/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 08/26/2011date Of Correction: 10/07/2011	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 05/26/2011date Of Correction: 07/07/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”
Deficiency #3		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 10/14/2009date Of Correction: 11/25/2009	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”
Deficiency #4		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 10/14/2009date Of Correction: 01/11/2010	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That A Doctor Approves A Resident's Admission In Writing And That Each Resident Remains Under The Care Of A Doctor.survey Date: 08/26/2011date Of Correction: 10/07/2011	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.survey Date: 10/14/2009date Of Correction: 11/25/2009	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 10/14/2009date Of Correction: 11/25/2009	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Review The Work Of Each Nurse Aide Every Year; And 2) Give Regular In-service Training Based Upon These Reviews.survey Date: 05/26/2011date Of Correction: 07/07/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication		30.1 %	vs	31.6 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased		3.3 %	vs	0.5 - 2.0
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		4.9 %	vs	16.5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers		7.5 %	vs	8.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight		11.1 %	vs	6.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder		1.4 %	vs	1.50 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection		2.7 %	vs	6.6 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms		75.2 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained		1.3 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		36.4 %	vs	41.5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine		90.8 %	vs	96.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened		89.3 %	vs	96.5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication		75.2 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury		2.6 / 3	vs	5.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication		27.2 %	vs	29.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased		4.5 %	vs	0.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		9.4 / 10.4	vs	13.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers		5 %	vs	10.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight		11.9 %	vs	6.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder		27.5 %	vs	59.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder		2.8 %	vs	2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection		3.2 %	vs	8.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms		75.2 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained		1.2 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury		2.4 %	vs	4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		32 %	vs	38.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine		63.3 %	vs	93.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened		83.6 %	vs	94 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication		25.4 %	vs	17.3:1
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Compare APPLE REHAB SAYBROOK vs APPLE REHAB WATERTOWN Nursing Homes USA