VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > Comparison

Compare ASPEN LIVING CENTER VS CAMBRIDGE CARE CENTER
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 48 differences and 26 similarities between ASPEN LIVING CENTER, CAMBRIDGE CARE CENTER
 
General
City   Colorado Springs vs   Lakewood  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “City”

State attribute explanation   Co vs   Co  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”

Street   1795 Monterey Road vs   1685 Eaton Street  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Street”

Zip Code   80,910 vs   80,214  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Zip Code”

Phone   7,194,717,850 vs   3,032,324,405  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Phone”

Overall Star Rating   
2
vs   5
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”

Health Inspections Star Rating   
1
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”

Nurse Staffing Star Rating   
4
vs   5
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”

Quality Measures Star Rating   
4
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”

RN Only Star Rating   
5
vs   5
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”

Number of Certified Beds   
112
vs   100
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”

Total Number of Residents   
78
vs   83
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”

Percent of Occupied Beds   
70 %
vs   83 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”

Health Survey Date   4/28/2011 vs   2/2/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”

Fire Survey Date   5/11/2011 vs   3/1/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”

Sprinkler Status   Fully Sprinklered vs   Fully Sprinklered  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”

Program Participation   Medicare And Medicaid vs   Medicare And Medicaid  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Program Participation”

Type of Ownership   For Profit - Corporation vs   For Profit - Corporation  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”

Located Within a Hospital?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”

Multi Nursing Home Ownership?   Yes vs   Yes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”

Resident and Family Councils   Both vs   Both  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”

Continuing Care Retirement Community?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”

Quality Indicator Survey?   Yes vs   Yes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”

Special Focus Facility?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”

Civil Money Penalty Count   
2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”

Total Enforcement Actions Count   
3
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”

# of deficiencies   8 vs   7  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Add Comment about “General

cancel
Staff Information
Number of Residents   
78
vs   83
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Residents”

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.94
vs   1.09
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.7
vs   0.58
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.64
vs   1.67
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.09
vs   0.08
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.09
vs   0.08
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Add Comment about “Staff Information

cancel
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 05/03/2012date Of Correction: 06/13/2012 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Environmental Deficiencies

cancel
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 05/03/2012date Of Correction: 06/13/2012 vs   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 02/02/2012date Of Correction: 03/08/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.survey Date: 05/03/2012date Of Correction: 06/13/2012 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Mistreatment Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 05/03/2012date Of Correction: 06/13/2012 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Resident Rights Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.survey Date: 05/03/2012date Of Correction: 06/13/2012 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.survey Date: 02/02/2012date Of Correction: 03/08/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.survey Date: 05/03/2012date Of Correction: 06/13/2012 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Treatment/services To Not Only Continue, But Improve The Ability To Care For Themselves.survey Date: 02/02/2012date Of Correction: 03/08/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 05/03/2012date Of Correction: 06/13/2012 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 06/17/2010date Of Correction: 07/30/2010  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.survey Date: 05/03/2012date Of Correction: 06/13/2012 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Add Comment about “Quality Care Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1    vs   Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Maintain 15 Months Of Resident Assessments In The Resident's Active Clinical Record.survey Date: 06/17/2010date Of Correction: 07/30/2010  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Resident Assessment Deficiencies

cancel
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Employ Or Obtain Outside Professional Resources Providing Services In The Nursing Home That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 06/17/2010date Of Correction: 07/30/2010  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Administration Deficiencies

cancel
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Paid Feeding Assistants 1) Completed Training; 2) Works Under The Supervision Of A Rn Or Lpn; And 3) Feeds Only Residents Who Have No Complicated Feeding Problems.survey Date: 06/17/2010date Of Correction: 07/30/2010  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
35.8 %
vs   29.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
75.2 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
16.2 %
vs   8.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
10.5 %
vs   4.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
5.4 %
vs   9.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
42.9 %
vs   30.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
6 %
vs   7.9:1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
5.4 %
vs   2.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
6.8 %
vs   3.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
1.4 %
vs   1.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
32 %
vs   27.8 (82.0)
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
76 %
vs   79.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
41.5 %
vs   65.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
75.2 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
1.4 %
vs   2.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q1

cancel
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
34.3 %
vs   29.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
75.2 %
vs   1.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
15.8 %
vs   6.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
5.7 %
vs   8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
4 %
vs   8.6:1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
47.8 %
vs   34.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
5.8 %
vs   9.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
4.9 %
vs   1.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
10.7:1
vs   10.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
0.9 %
vs   1.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
1.3 %
vs   2.20 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
30.9 %
vs   27.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
63.2 %
vs   80.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
40.8 %
vs   58 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
19 %
vs   3.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q3

cancel

Compare ASPEN LIVING CENTER vs CAMBRIDGE CARE CENTER Nursing Homes USA


Scroll To Top

saved