VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ASPEN LIVING CENTER

ASPEN LIVING CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ASPEN LIVING CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City COLORADO SPRINGS   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have COLORADO SPRINGS
State attribute explanation CO   vs 1.3% Nursing Homes USA have CO
Street 1795 MONTEREY ROAD  
Zip Code 80910  
Phone 7194717850  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
112  (3.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
78  (13.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
70 % (13.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/28/2011  
Fire Survey Date 5/11/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(53.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 8  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
78  (13.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.94  (0.17 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.7  (0.14 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.64  (0.05 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09  (5.4 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09  (0.01 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/03/2012
date Of Correction: 06/13/2012 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 05/03/2012
date Of Correction: 06/13/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.
survey Date: 05/03/2012
date Of Correction: 06/13/2012 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 05/03/2012
date Of Correction: 06/13/2012 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 05/03/2012
date Of Correction: 06/13/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 05/03/2012
date Of Correction: 06/13/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 05/03/2012
date Of Correction: 06/13/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 05/03/2012
date Of Correction: 06/13/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
35.8 % (10.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.2 % (0.46 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.5 % (2.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.4 % (6.43 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
42.9 % (1.64 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6 % (9.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.4 % (8.06 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.8 % (21.58 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.4 % (42.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
32 % (6.98 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
76 % (8.64 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
41.5 % (42.44 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4 % (14.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
34.3 % (8.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.8 % (1.7 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.7 % (3.52 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4 % (4.5 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
47.8 % (4.42 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.8 % (4.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.9 % (4.68 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 10.7:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.9 % (37.63 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.3 % (9.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
30.9 % (6.14 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
63.2 % (18.24 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
40.8 % (33.95 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
19 % (1.66 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved