Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Auburn
vs
Chicago
State attribute explanation
Il
vs
Il
Street
304 Maple Avenue
vs
1425 West Estes Avenue
Zip Code
62,615
vs
60,626
Phone
2,174,386,125
vs
7,739,734,780
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
3
vs
2
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
vs
5
RN Only Star Rating
4
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
70
vs
160
Total Number of Residents
63
vs
151
Percent of Occupied Beds
90 %
vs
94 %
Health Survey Date
2/2/2012
vs
4/13/2012
Fire Survey Date
2/9/2012
vs
4/17/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Individual
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
2
vs
3
Staff Information
Number of Residents
63
vs
151
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.72
vs
0.53
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.59
vs
0.45
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.3
vs
0.98
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09
vs
0.01
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09
vs
0.01
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 11/17/2010date Of Correction: 12/17/2010
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 09/08/2009date Of Correction: 09/26/2009
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 07/19/2011date Of Correction: 08/04/2011
vs
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 07/19/2011date Of Correction: 08/04/2011
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.survey Date: 01/12/2010date Of Correction: 02/01/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.8 %
vs
32.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.3 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.5 %
vs
4.9 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
17.1:1
vs
12.1:1
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.9 %
vs
3.4 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
25.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
13.6-28
vs
1.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
21.8 %
vs
6.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
11.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10 %
vs
7.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
62 %
vs
66.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
73.1 %
vs
61.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.8 %
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.6 %
vs
0.7 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22 %
vs
32.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.1 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8 %
vs
3.9 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9 %
vs
14.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.1:1
vs
2.5 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.6 %
vs
23.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
13.5 %
vs
1.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13.7 %
vs
4.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.5 %
vs
7.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.5 %
vs
0.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
17.4 %
vs
12.6:1
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
66 %
vs
57.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
70.9 %
vs
5.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.8 %
vs
Compare AUBURN NURSING & REHAB CENTER vs ATRIUM HEALTH CARE CENTER Nursing Homes USA
cancel