Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Laurel
vs
Mccomb
State attribute explanation
Ms
vs
Ms
Street
940
vs
1714 White Street
Zip Code
39,440
vs
39,648
Phone
6,016,498,006
vs
6,012,500,066
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
2
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
vs
3
RN Only Star Rating
2
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
120
vs
30
Total Number of Residents
112
vs
28
Percent of Occupied Beds
93 %
vs
93 %
Health Survey Date
6/15/2011
vs
12/20/2011
Fire Survey Date
6/14/2011
vs
12/21/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Limited Liability Company
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
Yes
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
3
vs
Staff Information
Number of Residents
112
vs
28
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.43
vs
0.9
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.92
vs
0.89
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.35
vs
1.79
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02
vs
0.04
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02
vs
0.04
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.survey Date: 04/08/2010date Of Correction: 05/21/2010
vs
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.survey Date: 04/08/2010date Of Correction: 05/21/2010
vs
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.survey Date: 04/08/2010date Of Correction: 05/21/2010
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.7 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.7 (74.7)
vs
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.2 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
14.9-28
vs
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.7 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.3 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.1 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.7 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
36.8 %
vs
10.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.5 %
vs
95.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 %
vs
98.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1 %
vs
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.3 %
vs
17.1:1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.5 %
vs
3.9 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.1 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.7 %
vs
5.7 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.3 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.7 %
vs
10.3:1
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.9 %
vs
22.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.6 %
vs
2.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.1 %
vs
14.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
36.8 %
vs
14.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95 %
vs
95.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.7 %
vs
99.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
9.2 %
vs
1.8 %
Compare CARE CENTER OF LAUREL vs CAMELLIA ESTATES Nursing Homes USA
cancel