Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Charles City
vs
Mason City
State attribute explanation
Ia
vs
Ia
Street
602 Eleventh Street
vs
302 Second Street Ne
Zip Code
50,616
vs
50,401
Phone
6,412,282,353
vs
6,414,241,740
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
2
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
5
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
2
vs
3
Number of Certified Beds
61
vs
200
Total Number of Residents
54
vs
187
Percent of Occupied Beds
89 %
vs
94 %
Health Survey Date
6/29/2012
vs
4/20/2012
Fire Survey Date
7/5/2012
vs
4/19/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
Non Profit - Church Related
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
Yes
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
3
vs
2
Staff Information
Number of Residents
54
vs
187
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.49
vs
0.43
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.47
vs
0.62
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.96
vs
1.06
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.03
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.03
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 05/20/2011date Of Correction: 06/16/2011
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 03/15/2012date Of Correction: Not Available
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 05/03/2010date Of Correction: 05/18/2010
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 03/04/2011date Of Correction: 03/25/2011
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.survey Date: 05/20/2011date Of Correction: 06/16/2011
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33.3 %
vs
19.4:1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
vs
1.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.5 %
vs
7.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 %
vs
4.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.8:1
vs
4 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
33.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.8 %
vs
7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.8 %
vs
4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
3.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
1.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
vs
15.9:1
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
vs
92.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
vs
91.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
10.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.8 %
vs
4 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
35.4 %
vs
21.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
1.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.1 %
vs
6.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.9 %
vs
3.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.6:1
vs
2.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
50.7 %
vs
30 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.9 %
vs
4.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.1 %
vs
3.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.3 %
vs
4.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
1.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
12.4-2413.6-24
vs
5.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20 %
vs
17.1:1
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 %
vs
94.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 %
vs
93.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
5 %
vs
4.2 %
Compare CHAUTAUQUA GUEST HOME #2 vs GOOD SHEPHERD HEALTH CENTER Nursing Homes USA
cancel