VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > Comparison

Compare CREST VIEW LUTHERAN HOME VS STEWARTVILLE CARE CENTER
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 43 differences and 29 similarities between CREST VIEW LUTHERAN HOME, STEWARTVILLE CARE CENTER
 
General
City   Columbia Heights vs   Stewartville  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “City”

State attribute explanation   Mn vs   Mn  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”

Street   4444 Reservoir Boulevard Northeast vs   120 Fourth Street Northeast  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Street”

Zip Code   55,421 vs   55,976  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Zip Code”

Phone   7,637,821,611 vs   5,075,334,288  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Phone”

Overall Star Rating   
2
vs   2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”

Health Inspections Star Rating   
1
vs   1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”

Nurse Staffing Star Rating   
4
vs   5
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”

Quality Measures Star Rating   
2
vs   3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”

RN Only Star Rating   
4
vs   5
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”

Number of Certified Beds   
122
vs   85
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”

Total Number of Residents   
114
vs   78
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”

Percent of Occupied Beds   
93 %
vs   92 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”

Health Survey Date   5/2/2012 vs   5/24/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”

Fire Survey Date   4/25/2012 vs   5/24/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”

Sprinkler Status   Fully Sprinklered vs   Fully Sprinklered  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”

Program Participation   Medicare And Medicaid vs   Medicare And Medicaid  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Program Participation”

Type of Ownership   Non Profit - Corporation vs   Non Profit - Corporation  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”

Located Within a Hospital?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”

Multi Nursing Home Ownership?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”

Resident and Family Councils   Both vs   Both  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”

Continuing Care Retirement Community?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”

Quality Indicator Survey?   Yes vs   Yes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”

Special Focus Facility?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”

Civil Money Penalty Count   
6
vs   1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”

Total Enforcement Actions Count   
6
vs   1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”

# of deficiencies   
4
vs   7
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Add Comment about “General

cancel
Staff Information
Number of Residents   
114
vs   78
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Residents”

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.79
vs   0.88
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.69
vs   0.61
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.48
vs   1.49
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.04
vs   0.04
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.04
vs   0.04
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Add Comment about “Staff Information

cancel
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 03/30/2010date Of Correction: 05/09/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Environmental Deficiencies

cancel
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 12/21/2010date Of Correction: 02/24/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 12/21/2010date Of Correction: 02/24/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.survey Date: 12/21/2010date Of Correction: 02/24/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Add Comment about “Mistreatment Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 09/10/2009date Of Correction: 10/15/2009 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 12/21/2010date Of Correction: 02/24/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 09/10/2009date Of Correction: 10/15/2009 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 12/21/2010date Of Correction: 02/24/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Quality Care Deficiencies

cancel
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 09/10/2009date Of Correction: 10/15/2009 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Administration Deficiencies

cancel
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.survey Date: 12/21/2010date Of Correction: 02/24/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2    vs   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.survey Date: 09/18/2009date Of Correction: 10/27/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
27.7 %
vs   28.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
2.1 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
20.5 %
vs   20 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
6.8 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
7 %
vs   7.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
48.5 %
vs   51.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
4.4 %
vs   9.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
5.9 %
vs   2.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
75.2 %
vs   13.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
2.9 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
32.3 %
vs   23.7 (74.7)
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
81.3 %
vs   89.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
78.3 %
vs   97.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
75.2
vs   3.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
1.9 %
vs   4.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q1

cancel
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
28.4 %
vs   31.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
1.2 %
vs   1.50 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
21.8 %
vs   21.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
4.9 %
vs   1.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
8.2 %
vs   8.6:1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
50.9 %
vs   50.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
5.1 %
vs   8.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
4.6 %
vs   4.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
2.8 %
vs   11.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
2.6 / 3
vs   0.5 - 2.0
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
3.6 %
vs   4.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
30.1 %
vs   23.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
77.7 %
vs   69.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
75.6 %
vs   92.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
18.4 %
vs   13.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q3

cancel

Compare CREST VIEW LUTHERAN HOME vs STEWARTVILLE CARE CENTER Nursing Homes USA


Scroll To Top

saved