Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Elk River
vs
Columbia Heights
State attribute explanation
Mn
vs
Mn
Street
400 Evans Avenue
vs
4444 Reservoir Boulevard Northeast
Zip Code
55,330
vs
55,421
Phone
7,632,414,405
vs
7,637,821,611
Overall Star Rating
5
vs
2
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
1
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
5
vs
2
RN Only Star Rating
4
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
120
vs
122
Total Number of Residents
111
vs
114
Percent of Occupied Beds
93 %
vs
93 %
Health Survey Date
2/2/2012
vs
5/2/2012
Fire Survey Date
2/1/2012
vs
4/25/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Church Related
vs
Non Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
6
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
6
# of deficiencies
1
vs
4
Staff Information
Number of Residents
111
vs
114
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.88
vs
0.79
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.75
vs
0.69
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.63
vs
1.48
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07
vs
0.04
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07
vs
0.04
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 03/30/2010date Of Correction: 05/09/2010
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 03/16/2012date Of Correction: 04/12/2012
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 09/10/2009date Of Correction: 10/15/2009
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 09/10/2009date Of Correction: 10/15/2009
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 09/10/2009date Of Correction: 10/15/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.5 %
vs
27.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.5 - 2.0
vs
2.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.4 / 10.4
vs
20.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.2 %
vs
6.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 %
vs
7 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
65.9 %
vs
48.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.8 %
vs
4.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.4 %
vs
5.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
20.9 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
2.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.8 %
vs
32.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97 %
vs
81.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.7 %
vs
78.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.1 %
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3 %
vs
1.9 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.9 (55.2)
vs
28.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.7 %
vs
1.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.7 %
vs
21.8 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.3 %
vs
4.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.6 %
vs
8.2 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
68 %
vs
50.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 %
vs
5.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4 %
vs
4.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
14 %
vs
2.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
2.6 / 3
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7 %
vs
3.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22 %
vs
30.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.2 %
vs
77.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97 %
vs
75.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
15.4 %
vs
18.4 %
Compare GUARDIAN ANGELS CARE CENTER vs CREST VIEW LUTHERAN HOME Nursing Homes USA
cancel