Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
New Richmond
vs
Pewaukee
State attribute explanation
Wi
vs
Wi
Street
505 W 8th St
vs
321 Riverside Dr
Zip Code
54,017
vs
53,072
Phone
7,152,466,851
vs
2,626,912,300
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
5
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
5
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
2
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
5
vs
2
Number of Certified Beds
61
vs
175
Total Number of Residents
29
vs
141
Percent of Occupied Beds
48 %
vs
81 %
Health Survey Date
6/15/2011
vs
11/22/2011
Fire Survey Date
7/12/2011
vs
11/22/2011
Sprinkler Status
Partially Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Yes
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
3
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
3
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
4
vs
1
Staff Information
Number of Residents
29
vs
141
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.34
vs
0.41
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
vs
0.68
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.34
vs
1.1
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02
vs
0.04
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02
vs
0.04
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 03/24/2010date Of Correction: 04/09/2010
vs
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 07/01/2010date Of Correction: 05/18/2010
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 07/01/2010date Of Correction: 05/18/2010
vs
Deficiency #3
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 07/01/2010date Of Correction: 05/18/2010
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.survey Date: 08/24/2009date Of Correction: 09/18/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
vs
43.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
vs
0.9 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
vs
9.4 / 10.4
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
vs
13.2 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
42.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
vs
5.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
vs
5.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
vs
2.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
vs
2.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.8 %
vs
8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
73.8 %
vs
93.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
67.4 %
vs
87.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
12.5 %
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
vs
3.7 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25 %
vs
42.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
2.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.5 %
vs
0.6 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.8:1
vs
6.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.9 %
vs
12 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
37.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.6 %
vs
4.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.4 %
vs
5.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.8 %
vs
1.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
2.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.4 %
vs
2.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
37.5 %
vs
8.6:1
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
68.7 %
vs
90.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
57.7 %
vs
92.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
7.7 %
vs
8.1 / 8.8
Compare DEERFIELD CARE CENTER, LLC vs RIVER HILLS WEST HCC Nursing Homes USA
cancel