Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Reseda
vs
Eureka
State attribute explanation
Ca
vs
Ca
Street
18855 Victory Bl
vs
6400 Purdue Drive
Zip Code
91,335
vs
95,503
Phone
8,187,743,000
vs
7,074,435,668
Overall Star Rating
5
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
5
vs
5
RN Only Star Rating
2
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
166
vs
99
Total Number of Residents
165
vs
62
Percent of Occupied Beds
99 %
vs
63 %
Health Survey Date
5/24/2011
vs
10/21/2011
Fire Survey Date
6/3/2011
vs
10/25/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Yes
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
vs
5
Staff Information
Number of Residents
165
vs
62
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.37
vs
0.9
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.92
vs
0.95
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.28
vs
1.85
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08
vs
0.13
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08
vs
0.13
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 05/06/2009date Of Correction: 08/25/2009
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 10/29/2010date Of Correction: 12/10/2010
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Help And Prepare Each Resident For A Safe And Easy Discharge And Transfer From The Nursing Home.survey Date: 05/05/2009date Of Correction: 07/01/2009
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 05/17/2012date Of Correction: 06/26/2012
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 05/05/2009date Of Correction: 07/01/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.1 %
vs
23.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.3 %
vs
7.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.9 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.4 %
vs
1.7 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
61.1 %
vs
24.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.5 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.8 %
vs
3.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.5 %
vs
13 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.6 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
vs
4.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
vs
58.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
vs
58.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
4 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.5 %
vs
3.3 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29 %
vs
22.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.4 %
vs
16.2 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.4 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5 %
vs
3.1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
57.4 %
vs
33 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.20 %
vs
0.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3 %
vs
3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9 %
vs
17.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.6 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
13.7 %
vs
1.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.4 %
vs
21 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
69.6 %
vs
45.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
84.3 %
vs
51.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
vs
5.2 %
Compare EISENBERG VILLAGE vs SEAVIEW REHABILITATION & WELLNESS CENTER, LP Nursing Homes USA
cancel