VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > SEAVIEW REHABILITATION & WELLNESS CENTER, LP

SEAVIEW REHABILITATION & WELLNESS CENTER, LP

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
SEAVIEW REHABILITATION & WELLNESS CENTER, LP VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Eureka  vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have Eureka
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 6400 PURDUE DRIVE  
Zip Code 95503  
Phone 7074435668  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
99  (9.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
62  (29.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
63 % (20.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/21/2011  
Fire Survey Date 10/25/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 5  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
62  (29.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.9  (0.13 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.95  (0.11 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.85  (0.26 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.13  (5.36 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.13  (0.03 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/06/2009
date Of Correction: 08/25/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 10/29/2010
date Of Correction: 12/10/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Help And Prepare Each Resident For A Safe And Easy Discharge And Transfer From The Nursing Home.
survey Date: 05/05/2009
date Of Correction: 07/01/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 05/17/2012
date Of Correction: 06/26/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/05/2009
date Of Correction: 07/01/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.1 % (1.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.5 % (9.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 % (62.62 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.7 % (10.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.2 % (20.34 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.4 % (10.06 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
13 % (15.38 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.5 % (20.52 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
58.7 % (25.94 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
58.7 % (25.24 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4 % (41.9 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3 % (12.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.9 % (2.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.2 % (2.1 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 % (65.98 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.1 % (5.4 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33 % (10.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.7 % (9.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3 % (6.58 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
17.2 % (2.66 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8 % (8.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21 % (3.76 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
45.9 % (35.54 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
51.9 % (22.85 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
5.2 % (12.14 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved