Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Briarcliff Manor
vs
Great Neck
State attribute explanation
Ny
vs
Ny
Street
620 Sleepy Hollow Road
vs
199 Community Drive
Zip Code
10,510
vs
11,021
Phone
9,149,415,100
vs
5,163,659,229
Overall Star Rating
1
vs
5
Health Inspections Star Rating
2
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
1
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
vs
5
RN Only Star Rating
1
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
131
vs
200
Total Number of Residents
110
vs
180
Percent of Occupied Beds
84 %
vs
90 %
Health Survey Date
4/6/2012
vs
4/3/2012
Fire Survey Date
4/6/2012
vs
4/3/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
3
vs
1
Staff Information
Number of Residents
110
vs
180
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.32
vs
0.8
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.93
vs
0.8
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.25
vs
1.6
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.09
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.09
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 09/02/2009date Of Correction: 09/30/2009
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 08/17/2011date Of Correction: 10/01/2011
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 05/05/2010date Of Correction: 06/10/2010
vs
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 09/02/2009date Of Correction: 09/30/2009
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
37.6 %
vs
21.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.8 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.4 %
vs
4.6 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.1:1
vs
5.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.5 %
vs
3.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
28.3 %
vs
51.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2 %
vs
0.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.3 %
vs
4.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.9 %
vs
37 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
13.8 %
vs
1.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.3 %
vs
14.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.5 %
vs
89.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
67.9 %
vs
93.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.9 %
vs
3.8 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33.3 %
vs
21.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3 %
vs
0.5 - 2.0
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.5 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.2-20
vs
7.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.1 %
vs
6.4 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
28 %
vs
66.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.6 %
vs
1.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.5 %
vs
4.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.6 %
vs
22.1 (71.8)
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
9.3 %
vs
1.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.5 %
vs
11.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
66.7 %
vs
56.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
52 %
vs
91.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
12.7 %
vs
12.3:1
Compare ELANT AT BRANDYWINE INC vs HIGHFIELD GARDENS CARE CENTER OF GREAT NECK Nursing Homes USA
cancel