Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Peekskill
vs
Briarcliff Manor
State attribute explanation
Ny
vs
Ny
Street
2000 East Main Street
vs
620 Sleepy Hollow Road
Zip Code
10,566
vs
10,510
Phone
9,147,378,400
vs
9,149,415,100
Overall Star Rating
5
vs
1
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
1
Quality Measures Star Rating
5
vs
3
RN Only Star Rating
3
vs
1
Number of Certified Beds
100
vs
131
Total Number of Residents
89
vs
110
Percent of Occupied Beds
89 %
vs
84 %
Health Survey Date
1/31/2012
vs
4/6/2012
Fire Survey Date
1/31/2012
vs
4/6/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
Non Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
2
# of deficiencies
1
vs
3
Staff Information
Number of Residents
89
vs
110
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.66
vs
0.32
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.03
vs
0.93
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.69
vs
1.25
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.05
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.05
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 05/15/2012date Of Correction: 05/29/2012
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 09/02/2009date Of Correction: 09/30/2009
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 05/05/2010date Of Correction: 06/10/2010
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 09/02/2009date Of Correction: 09/30/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.1 %
vs
37.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.50 %
vs
6.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 %
vs
4.4 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.6:1
vs
12.1:1
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.5 %
vs
8.5 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
42.1 %
vs
28.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.4 %
vs
2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.2 %
vs
11.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
29.4 %
vs
0.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.3 %
vs
13.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7 %
vs
8.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
70 %
vs
87.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
64.2 %
vs
67.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.2 %
vs
0.9 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.7 (72.9)
vs
33.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.9 %
vs
3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.8 %
vs
5.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.9 %
vs
11.2-20
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.4 %
vs
7.1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40 %
vs
28 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.5 - 2.0
vs
1.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.8 %
vs
9.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
35.9 %
vs
0.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3 %
vs
9.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.8 %
vs
1.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.3 %
vs
14.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.6 %
vs
66.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
73.9 %
vs
52 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
11.9 %
vs
12.7 %
Compare WEST LEDGE REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER vs ELANT AT BRANDYWINE INC Nursing Homes USA
cancel