VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > Comparison

Compare FRANKLIN HILLS HEALTH & REHAB CENTER VS SAN JUAN REHAB AND CARE CENTER
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 62 differences and 17 similarities between FRANKLIN HILLS HEALTH & REHAB CENTER, SAN JUAN REHAB AND CARE CENTER
 
General
City   Spokane vs   Anacortes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “City”

State attribute explanation   Wa vs   Wa  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”

Street   6021 North Lidgerwood vs   911 21st Street  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Street”

Zip Code   99,207 vs   98,221  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Zip Code”

Phone   5,094,893,323 vs   3,602,937,222  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Phone”

Overall Star Rating   
1
vs   5
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”

Health Inspections Star Rating   
1
vs   5
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”

Nurse Staffing Star Rating   
2
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”

Quality Measures Star Rating   
2
vs   2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”

RN Only Star Rating   
4
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”

Number of Certified Beds   
100
vs   52
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”

Total Number of Residents   
98
vs   48
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”

Percent of Occupied Beds   
98 %
vs   92 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”

Health Survey Date   6/9/2011 vs   3/2/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”

Fire Survey Date   5/31/2011 vs   3/6/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”

Sprinkler Status   Fully Sprinklered vs   Fully Sprinklered  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”

Program Participation   Medicare And Medicaid vs   Medicare And Medicaid  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Program Participation”

Type of Ownership   For Profit - Corporation vs   For Profit - Corporation  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”

Located Within a Hospital?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”

Multi Nursing Home Ownership?   Yes vs   Yes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”

Resident and Family Councils   Both vs   Resident  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”

Continuing Care Retirement Community?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”

Quality Indicator Survey?   Yes vs   Yes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”

Special Focus Facility?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”

Civil Money Penalty Count   
75.2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”

Total Enforcement Actions Count   
75.2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”

# of deficiencies   
15
vs   2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Add Comment about “General

cancel
Staff Information
Number of Residents   
98
vs   48
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Residents”

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.05
vs   0.89
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.3
vs   0.9
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.35
vs   1.78
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.13
vs   0.32
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.13
vs   0.32
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Add Comment about “Staff Information

cancel
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 11/15/2010date Of Correction: 12/03/2010 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 10/25/2010date Of Correction: 12/01/2010  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 06/16/2009date Of Correction: 06/23/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Environmental Deficiencies

cancel
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 02/28/2011date Of Correction: 04/04/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Mistreatment Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 06/20/2011date Of Correction: 07/15/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 03/08/2011date Of Correction: 04/04/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Establish And Follow A Written Policy That Permits A Resident To Return To The Nursing Home After Hospitalization.survey Date: 07/15/2010date Of Correction: 09/03/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Tell The Resident Or The Resident's Representative In Writing How Long The Nursing Home Will Hold The Resident's Bed.survey Date: 07/15/2010date Of Correction: 09/03/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Add Comment about “Resident Rights Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 05/24/2012date Of Correction: 06/04/2012 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 06/20/2011date Of Correction: 07/15/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.survey Date: 03/08/2011date Of Correction: 04/04/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 03/08/2011date Of Correction: 04/04/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Deficiency #5   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 03/11/2010date Of Correction: 04/23/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #5”

Deficiency #6   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 04/29/2009date Of Correction: 06/01/2009 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #6”

Add Comment about “Quality Care Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.survey Date: 03/11/2010date Of Correction: 04/23/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Resident Assessment Deficiencies

cancel
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 04/29/2009date Of Correction: 06/01/2009 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Administration Deficiencies

cancel
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.survey Date: 07/15/2010date Of Correction: 09/03/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
13.4 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
5.1 %
vs   3.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
39.9 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
9.4 / 10.4
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
6.7 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
34.8 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
4.4 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
5.3 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
2.7 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
75.2 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
48.1 %
vs   25 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
75.5 %
vs   100 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
68.4 %
vs   100 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
75.2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
1.3 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q1

cancel
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
21.3 %
vs   32.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
3.3 %
vs   2.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
36.6 %
vs   17.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
8.4 %
vs   10.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
11.9 %
vs   6.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
48.2 %
vs   68.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
3 %
vs   6.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
5 %
vs   12 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
1.50 %
vs   11 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
75.2 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
2.4 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
52.3 %
vs   29.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
60.5 %
vs   100 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
69.6 %
vs   98.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
12.1:1
vs   10.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q3

cancel

Compare FRANKLIN HILLS HEALTH & REHAB CENTER vs SAN JUAN REHAB AND CARE CENTER Nursing Homes USA


Scroll To Top

saved