Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Corpus Christi
vs
San Antonio
State attribute explanation
Tx
vs
Tx
Street
1314 3rd Street
vs
5027 Pecan Grove
Zip Code
78,401
vs
78,222
Phone
3,618,885,511
vs
2,103,336,815
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
2
Health Inspections Star Rating
2
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
1
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
4
vs
1
Number of Certified Beds
114
vs
222
Total Number of Residents
80
vs
137
Percent of Occupied Beds
70 %
vs
62 %
Health Survey Date
6/21/2012
vs
4/12/2012
Fire Survey Date
6/21/2012
vs
4/11/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
1
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
4
vs
2
Staff Information
Number of Residents
80
vs
137
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.05
vs
0.23
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.18
vs
1.26
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.23
vs
1.49
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.12
vs
0.05
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.12
vs
0.05
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 02/04/2012date Of Correction: 02/05/2012
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.survey Date: 03/28/2011date Of Correction: 04/28/2011
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 03/28/2011date Of Correction: 04/28/2011
vs
Deficiency #3
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 03/30/2010date Of Correction: 03/31/2010
vs
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.survey Date: 08/07/2009date Of Correction: 08/08/2009
vs
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.survey Date: 10/22/2010date Of Correction: Not Available
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32.3 %
vs
20 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
8.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 %
vs
2.1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
14 %
vs
3.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.3 %
vs
4.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
12.5 %
vs
5 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.4 / 10.4
vs
7.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
21.9 %
vs
11.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
3.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.8 (82.0)
vs
1.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
65.1 %
vs
66.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
56.3 %
vs
79.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.8 %
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.50 %
vs
3.9 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
31.4 (88.5)
vs
19.4:1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9 %
vs
6.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 %
vs
2.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.5 %
vs
5.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.2 %
vs
3.4 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29.2 %
vs
54.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
9.5 %
vs
4.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.5 %
vs
9.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
18.1:1
vs
18 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
2.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.50 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.3 %
vs
0.5 - 2.0
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
63.9 %
vs
60.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
58.5 %
vs
80.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.20 %
vs
6.8 %
Compare HARBOR VIEW CARE CENTER vs BUENA VIDA NURSING AND REHAB-SAN ANTONIO Nursing Homes USA
cancel