Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Macomb
vs
Westmont
State attribute explanation
Il
vs
Il
Street
8 Doctors Lane
vs
5801 South Cass Avenue
Zip Code
61,455
vs
60,559
Phone
3,098,335,555
vs
6,309,712,645
Overall Star Rating
5
vs
5
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
5
vs
5
RN Only Star Rating
5
vs
5
Number of Certified Beds
80
vs
203
Total Number of Residents
67
vs
158
Percent of Occupied Beds
84 %
vs
78 %
Health Survey Date
11/4/2011
vs
11/18/2011
Fire Survey Date
11/8/2011
vs
12/7/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
1
vs
3
Staff Information
Number of Residents
67
vs
158
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.17
vs
1.32
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.44
vs
0.71
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.61
vs
2.03
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.29
vs
0.38
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.29
vs
0.38
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 10/26/2011date Of Correction: 11/03/2011
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 05/31/2011date Of Correction: 06/28/2011
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 07/22/2010date Of Correction: 08/21/2010
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 09/22/2009date Of Correction: 10/13/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.1 %
vs
18.1:1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.50 %
vs
0.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
vs
3.4 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.8 %
vs
1.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.20 %
vs
7.5 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
56.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
11.5 %
vs
3.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 %
vs
2.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
31.6 %
vs
8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.7 %
vs
15.9:1
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.3 %
vs
88.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.2 %
vs
89.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.20 %
vs
4.7 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11 %
vs
18.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.2 %
vs
1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.1 %
vs
3.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.9 %
vs
3.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.2 %
vs
8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
30.8 %
vs
50.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8.8 %
vs
3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 %
vs
5.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
29.4 %
vs
7.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
0.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4 %
vs
4.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.9 / 15.3
vs
12 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.4 %
vs
78.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.3 %
vs
80 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
22.4:1
vs
16.2 %
Compare HEARTLAND OF MACOMB vs BURGESS SQUARE HEALTHCARE CTR Nursing Homes USA
cancel