Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Hollywood
vs
Sarasota
State attribute explanation
Fl
vs
Fl
Street
1200 N 35th Ave
vs
3250 12th St
Zip Code
33,021
vs
34,237
Phone
9,549,815,511
vs
9,413,654,185
Overall Star Rating
1
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
1
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
2
vs
3
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
1
vs
3
Number of Certified Beds
152
vs
87
Total Number of Residents
128
vs
82
Percent of Occupied Beds
84 %
vs
94 %
Health Survey Date
6/10/2011
vs
10/27/2011
Fire Survey Date
6/7/2011
vs
10/31/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
4
vs
2
Staff Information
Number of Residents
128
vs
82
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.46
vs
0.62
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.2
vs
0.83
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.67
vs
1.45
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.16
vs
0.07
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.16
vs
0.07
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.survey Date: 07/21/2011date Of Correction: 08/21/2011
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Treatment/services To Not Only Continue, But Improve The Ability To Care For Themselves.survey Date: 09/27/2010date Of Correction: 10/27/2010
Deficiency #2
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 12/13/2010date Of Correction: 01/13/2011
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 09/27/2010date Of Correction: 10/27/2010
Deficiency #3
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 05/12/2009date Of Correction: 06/17/2009
vs
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Or Get Quality Lab Services/tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents.survey Date: 08/29/2011date Of Correction: 09/21/2011
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.2 %
vs
18.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
2.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.9 %
vs
15 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.8:1
vs
3.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.9 %
vs
1.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.7 %
vs
4.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.8 %
vs
12.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.7 %
vs
4.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.9 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.2 %
vs
24.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.5 %
vs
72.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95.8 %
vs
73.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1 %
vs
4.7 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11 %
vs
20 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
2.20 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.1 %
vs
7.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.4 %
vs
6.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.9 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29.7 %
vs
56.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.7 %
vs
2.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
15.8 %
vs
11.6:1
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.7 %
vs
2.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2 %
vs
2.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.7 %
vs
17.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97 %
vs
76.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.8 %
vs
78.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.2 %
vs
4.2 %
Compare HOLLYWOOD HILLS REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC vs HEARTLAND HEALTH CARE CENTER - NORTH SARASOTA Nursing Homes USA
cancel