Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
London
vs
Madisonville
State attribute explanation
Ky
vs
Ky
Street
208 West Twelfth Street
vs
1500 Pride Avenue
Zip Code
40,743
vs
42,431
Phone
6,068,644,155
vs
2,708,211,813
Overall Star Rating
5
vs
2
Health Inspections Star Rating
5
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
3
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
vs
1
RN Only Star Rating
4
vs
3
Number of Certified Beds
155
vs
71
Total Number of Residents
140
vs
58
Percent of Occupied Beds
90 %
vs
82 %
Health Survey Date
4/19/2012
vs
6/1/2012
Fire Survey Date
4/17/2012
vs
5/30/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Yes
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
2
# of deficiencies
vs
5
Staff Information
Number of Residents
140
vs
58
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.93
vs
0.59
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.46
vs
1.02
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.39
vs
1.61
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
75.2
vs
0.02
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
vs
0.02
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 1deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.survey Date: 03/16/2011date Of Correction: 04/18/2011
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 02/17/2010date Of Correction: 02/20/2010
Deficiency #3
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 12/16/2009date Of Correction: 12/31/2009
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 08/26/2009date Of Correction: 09/10/2009
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 02/17/2010date Of Correction: 02/20/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23 %
vs
26.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
4.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.8 %
vs
18.4 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.4 %
vs
7.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10 %
vs
3.4 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
72.5 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.9:1
vs
2.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.4 %
vs
8.1 / 8.8
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.7 %
vs
19.4:1
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.3 %
vs
4.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.8 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.5 %
vs
66.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.6 %
vs
61.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
7.7 %
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.5 %
vs
3.2 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.6 %
vs
25.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
5.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.2 %
vs
17.7 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.2 %
vs
7.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.1:1
vs
2.3 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
73.2 %
vs
44.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8.1 / 8.8
vs
2.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.8 %
vs
11.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.20 %
vs
13 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.7 %
vs
3.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3 %
vs
3.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22.5 %
vs
52 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.9 %
vs
57.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.1 %
vs
53.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
27.5 %
vs
4.3 %
Compare LAUREL HEIGHTS HOME FOR THE ELDERLY vs HILLSIDE VILLA CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER Nursing Homes USA
cancel