Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Woodland Hills
vs
Los Angeles
State attribute explanation
Ca
vs
Ca
Street
23388 Mulholland Dr.
vs
975 North Virgil Avenue
Zip Code
91,364
vs
90,029
Phone
8,188,761,888
vs
2,136,658,209
Overall Star Rating
5
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
2
Quality Measures Star Rating
5
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
3
vs
2
Number of Certified Beds
195
vs
124
Total Number of Residents
63
vs
106
Percent of Occupied Beds
32 %
vs
85 %
Health Survey Date
9/11/2011
vs
1/27/2012
Fire Survey Date
9/11/2011
vs
1/27/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
Yes
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
2
vs
5
Staff Information
Number of Residents
63
vs
106
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.58
vs
0.48
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.78
vs
0.81
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.36
vs
1.29
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.28
vs
0.11
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.28
vs
0.11
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 01/24/2011date Of Correction: 12/29/2011
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 01/27/2012date Of Correction: 02/21/2012
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 07/22/2009date Of Correction: 10/26/2009
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 1deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.survey Date: 07/22/2009date Of Correction: 10/26/2009
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 07/22/2009date Of Correction: 10/26/2009
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 07/14/2009date Of Correction: 04/29/2010
vs
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature.survey Date: 07/22/2009date Of Correction: 10/26/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
35.1 %
vs
19.5-24
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
vs
3.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 %
vs
6 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.9 %
vs
13.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.3 %
vs
9.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
31.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.5 %
vs
3.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.8 %
vs
4.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
1.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
vs
11.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
vs
75 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
vs
71.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.5 %
vs
75.2 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
35.5 %
vs
21.2:1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
vs
1.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.8 %
vs
5.3 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.6 %
vs
8.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.6 %
vs
6.5 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
40.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.6 %
vs
4.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.9 %
vs
8.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.6 %
vs
2.20 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
1.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
9.6 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
vs
14.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
vs
70.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
vs
65.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
vs
2.8 %
Compare MOTION PICTURE AND T.V. HOSP D/P SNF vs VIRGIL REHABILITATION & SKILLED NURSING CENTER Nursing Homes USA
cancel