VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > VIRGIL REHABILITATION & SKILLED NURSING CENTER

VIRGIL REHABILITATION & SKILLED NURSING CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
VIRGIL REHABILITATION & SKILLED NURSING CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Los Angeles  vs 0.5% Nursing Homes USA have Los Angeles
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 975 NORTH VIRGIL AVENUE  
Zip Code 90029  
Phone 2136658209  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
124  (15.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
106  (14.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
85 % (1.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 1/27/2012  
Fire Survey Date 1/27/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 5  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
106  (14.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.48  (0.29 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.81  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.29  (0.3 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11  (5.38 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11  (0.01 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 01/27/2012
date Of Correction: 02/21/2012 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 07/22/2009
date Of Correction: 10/26/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.
survey Date: 07/22/2009
date Of Correction: 10/26/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 07/22/2009
date Of Correction: 10/26/2009 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature.
survey Date: 07/22/2009
date Of Correction: 10/26/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.5-24 % (5.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.7 % (29.25 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6 % (10.66 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
13.2 % (0.62 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.8 % (2.03 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
31.7 % (12.84 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.2 % (12.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.3 % (9.16 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.1 % (27.28 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1 % (42.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.4 % (13.62 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
75 % (9.64 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
71.2 % (12.74 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 21.2:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.3 % (22.4 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.3 % (8.8 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.7 % (0.52 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.5 % (2 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40.3 % (3.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.1 % (6.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.2 % (1.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.20 % (17.66 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.7 % (36.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (64.47 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.8 % (9.96 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
70.8 % (10.64 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
65.1 % (9.65 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.8 % (14.54 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved