Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Hot Springs
vs
Conway
State attribute explanation
Ar
vs
Ar
Street
1910 Malvern Avenue
vs
2401 Christina Lane
Zip Code
71,901
vs
72,032
Phone
5,013,211,000
vs
5,013,274,421
Overall Star Rating
5
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
5
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
vs
3
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
vs
5
RN Only Star Rating
vs
2
Number of Certified Beds
10
vs
121
Total Number of Residents
3
vs
102
Percent of Occupied Beds
30 %
vs
84 %
Health Survey Date
6/15/2012
vs
8/5/2011
Fire Survey Date
6/15/2012
vs
8/3/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
Yes
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
None
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
1
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
1
# of deficiencies
vs
7
Staff Information
Number of Residents
3
vs
102
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
vs
0.55
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
vs
0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
vs
1.39
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
vs
0.06
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
vs
0.06
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 03/17/2011date Of Correction: 04/15/2011
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 03/08/2012date Of Correction: 03/29/2012
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 03/08/2012date Of Correction: 03/29/2012
Deficiency #3
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.survey Date: 01/20/2012date Of Correction: 02/10/2012
Deficiency #4
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 12/10/2010date Of Correction: 01/09/2011
Deficiency #5
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 12/10/2010date Of Correction: 01/09/2011
Deficiency #6
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 09/03/2010date Of Correction: 09/30/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
vs
13.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
vs
29 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
vs
3.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
vs
5.1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
20 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
vs
6.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
vs
7.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
vs
1.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
39.8 %
vs
1.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.9 %
vs
92.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 %
vs
98.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
vs
3.9 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
vs
14.9-28
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.8 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
vs
26.7 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
vs
3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
vs
3.2 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
25.6 (78.1)
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
vs
5.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
vs
5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
vs
0.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
vs
3.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
46.9 %
vs
5.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.9 %
vs
93.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.2 %
vs
99.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Compare NATIONAL PARK MEDICAL CENTER vs SALEM PLACE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, INC Nursing Homes USA
cancel