VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > SALEM PLACE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, INC

SALEM PLACE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, INC

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
SALEM PLACE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, INC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City CONWAY   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have CONWAY
State attribute explanation AR   vs 1.5% Nursing Homes USA have AR
Street 2401 CHRISTINA LANE  
Zip Code 72032  
Phone 5013274421  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
121  (12.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
102  (10.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
84 % (0.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 8/5/2011  
Fire Survey Date 8/3/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 7  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
102  (10.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.55  (0.22 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.84  (equals average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.39  (0.2 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (5.43 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 03/17/2011
date Of Correction: 04/15/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 03/08/2012
date Of Correction: 03/29/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 03/08/2012
date Of Correction: 03/29/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 01/20/2012
date Of Correction: 02/10/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 12/10/2010
date Of Correction: 01/09/2011 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 12/10/2010
date Of Correction: 01/09/2011 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 09/03/2010
date Of Correction: 09/30/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.7 % (11.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29 % (12.34 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.8 % (8.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.1 % (6.73 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20 % (24.54 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.6 % (9.03 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.6 % (5.86 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.6 % (26.78 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.6 % (23.42 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.5 % (7.86 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.5 % (14.56 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.9 % (11.62 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.9-28 % (10.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.7 % (12.6 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3 % (6.22 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.2 % (5.3 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.6 (78.1) % (17.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.5 % (5.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5 % (4.58 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.6 % (19.26 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3 % (7.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.2 % (19.56 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.1 % (11.66 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.1 % (24.35 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved