Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Pewaukee
vs
Milwaukee
State attribute explanation
Wi
vs
Wi
Street
321 Riverside Dr
vs
2505 E Bradford Ave
Zip Code
53,072
vs
53,211
Phone
2,626,912,300
vs
4,149,636,151
Overall Star Rating
5
vs
5
Health Inspections Star Rating
5
vs
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
2
vs
5
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
2
vs
5
Number of Certified Beds
175
vs
40
Total Number of Residents
141
vs
24
Percent of Occupied Beds
81 %
vs
60 %
Health Survey Date
11/22/2011
vs
6/25/2012
Fire Survey Date
11/22/2011
vs
6/25/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
Non Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
Yes
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
1
vs
4
Staff Information
Number of Residents
141
vs
24
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.41
vs
1.81
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.68
vs
0.88
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.1
vs
2.69
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04
vs
0.06
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04
vs
0.06
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 08/01/2011date Of Correction: 09/04/2011
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 10/20/2009date Of Correction: 11/19/2009
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 10/20/2009date Of Correction: 11/19/2009
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.survey Date: 08/24/2009date Of Correction: 09/18/2009
vs
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 1deficiency: Make Sure That Doctors See A Resident's Plan Of Care At Every Visit And Make Notes About Progress And Orders In Writing.survey Date: 10/20/2009date Of Correction: 11/09/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
43.1 %
vs
44.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.9 %
vs
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.4 / 10.4
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.2 %
vs
11.1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
42.9 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.4 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.9 %
vs
11.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9 %
vs
2.6 / 3
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.9 %
vs
2.6 / 3
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8 %
vs
33.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.1 %
vs
90.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
87.9 %
vs
88.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
5.6:1
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.7 %
vs
5.1 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
42.5 %
vs
51.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.1 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.6 %
vs
4.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.6 %
vs
6.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12 %
vs
19.3 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37.9 %
vs
57.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.6 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.9 %
vs
7.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.9 %
vs
1.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.7 %
vs
3.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.4 %
vs
4.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.6:1
vs
25.6 (78.1)
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.3 %
vs
88.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
92.6 %
vs
92.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
8.1 / 8.8
vs
2.20 %
Compare RIVER HILLS WEST HCC vs EASTCASTLE PL BRADFORD TER CONV CTR Nursing Homes USA
cancel