Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Atlanta
vs
Lagrange
State attribute explanation
Ga
vs
Ga
Street
54 Peachtree Park Drive N.e.
vs
200 Medical Drive
Zip Code
30,309
vs
30,240
Phone
4,043,516,041
vs
7,068,453,252
Overall Star Rating
1
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
2
vs
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
1
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
vs
2
RN Only Star Rating
1
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
179
vs
150
Total Number of Residents
157
vs
137
Percent of Occupied Beds
88 %
vs
91 %
Health Survey Date
10/6/2011
vs
3/24/2011
Fire Survey Date
10/6/2011
vs
3/24/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Not Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
Non Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
Yes
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
1
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
1
vs
1
# of deficiencies
6
vs
Staff Information
Number of Residents
157
vs
137
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.27
vs
0.71
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.33
vs
1.07
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.6
vs
1.78
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11
vs
0.08
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11
vs
0.08
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 10/06/2011date Of Correction: Not Available
vs
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 08/06/2009date Of Correction: 08/06/2009
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 12/29/2011date Of Correction: 02/09/2012
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 08/06/2009date Of Correction: 08/06/2009
vs
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Encode And Automate The Resident's Assessment Data.survey Date: 10/06/2011date Of Correction: Not Available
vs
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Quickly Tell The Resident's Doctor The Results Of Lab Tests.survey Date: 06/09/2011date Of Correction: 07/15/2011
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.1:1
vs
32.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.6 %
vs
1.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.1 %
vs
12.2 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.2 %
vs
8.9 / 9.9
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.5 %
vs
10.7:1
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
32.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.5 %
vs
6.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.9:1
vs
6.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
14 %
vs
5.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.2 (68.4)
vs
30.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.4 %
vs
98.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
77.4 %
vs
97.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5 - 2.0
vs
3 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 %
vs
4.3 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.9 %
vs
35.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.4 %
vs
2.6 / 3
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.5 %
vs
15.4 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.5 %
vs
5.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.1 %
vs
13.9 / 15.3
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
36.3 %
vs
36.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.8 %
vs
8 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.2 %
vs
7.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10.5 %
vs
7.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.6 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.3 %
vs
4.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.1 %
vs
24.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
74.4 %
vs
96.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
78.1 %
vs
97.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
15.8 %
vs
2.8 %
Compare SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF BUCKHEAD vs FLORENCE HAND HOME Nursing Homes USA
cancel