VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > Comparison

Overview:

There are 69 differences and 21 similarities between ST JOSEPH'S MANOR CARE & REHABILITATION CENTER, TORRINGTON HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER
 
General
City   Trumbull vs   Torrington  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “City”

State attribute explanation   Ct vs   Ct  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”

Street   6448 Main Street vs   225 Wyoming Ave  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Street”

Zip Code   6,611 vs   6,790  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Zip Code”

Phone   2,032,686,204 vs   8,604,828,563  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Phone”

Overall Star Rating   
2
vs   3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”

Health Inspections Star Rating   
1
vs   2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”

Nurse Staffing Star Rating   
4
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”

Quality Measures Star Rating   
4
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”

RN Only Star Rating   
3
vs   3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”

Number of Certified Beds   
274
vs   126
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”

Total Number of Residents   
254
vs   101
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”

Percent of Occupied Beds   
93 %
vs   80 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”

Health Survey Date   10/3/2011 vs   8/25/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”

Fire Survey Date   9/26/2011 vs   8/31/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”

Sprinkler Status   Fully Sprinklered vs   Fully Sprinklered  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”

Program Participation   Medicare And Medicaid vs   Medicare And Medicaid  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Program Participation”

Type of Ownership   For Profit - Corporation vs   For Profit - Corporation  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”

Located Within a Hospital?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”

Multi Nursing Home Ownership?   Yes vs   Yes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”

Resident and Family Councils   Both vs   Both  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”

Continuing Care Retirement Community?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”

Quality Indicator Survey?   Yes vs   Yes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”

Special Focus Facility?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”

Civil Money Penalty Count   
75.2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”

Total Enforcement Actions Count   
75.2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”

# of deficiencies   24 vs   14  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Add Comment about “General

cancel
Staff Information
Number of Residents   
254
vs   101
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Residents”

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.51
vs   0.59
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.16
vs   0.81
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.67
vs   1.4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.08
vs   0.03
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.08
vs   0.03
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Add Comment about “Staff Information

cancel
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 10/03/2011date Of Correction: 11/14/2011 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 02/10/2012date Of Correction: 03/23/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2    vs   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 08/25/2011date Of Correction: 10/06/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely.survey Date: 12/04/2009date Of Correction: 01/15/2010  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 12/04/2009date Of Correction: 01/15/2010  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Add Comment about “Environmental Deficiencies

cancel
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 10/03/2011date Of Correction: 11/14/2011 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 07/30/2010date Of Correction: 09/10/2010  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 08/05/2010date Of Correction: 09/10/2010 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 12/04/2009date Of Correction: 01/15/2010  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Mistreatment Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.survey Date: 08/05/2010date Of Correction: 09/10/2010 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 08/25/2011date Of Correction: 10/06/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 08/05/2010date Of Correction: 09/10/2010 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 03/21/2011date Of Correction: 05/02/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 08/12/2009date Of Correction: 09/16/2009 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Let The Resident Or The Resident's Legal Representative The Right To Access Or Purchase Copies Of All Records.survey Date: 03/21/2011date Of Correction: 05/02/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 08/12/2009date Of Correction: 09/16/2009 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Add Comment about “Resident Rights Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 10/03/2011date Of Correction: 11/14/2011 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 03/21/2011date Of Correction: 05/02/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 10/03/2011date Of Correction: 11/14/2011 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 12/04/2009date Of Correction: 01/15/2010  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 10/03/2011date Of Correction: 11/14/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.survey Date: 10/03/2011date Of Correction: 11/14/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Deficiency #5   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 08/05/2010date Of Correction: 09/10/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #5”

Deficiency #6   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 08/05/2010date Of Correction: 09/10/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #6”

Deficiency #7   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 04/06/2010date Of Correction: 05/14/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #7”

Deficiency #8   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 04/06/2010date Of Correction: 05/14/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #8”

Deficiency #9   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 08/12/2009date Of Correction: 09/16/2009 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #9”

Add Comment about “Quality Care Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.survey Date: 10/03/2011date Of Correction: 11/14/2011 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.survey Date: 12/04/2009date Of Correction: 01/15/2010  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 10/03/2011date Of Correction: 11/14/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.survey Date: 10/03/2011date Of Correction: 11/14/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.survey Date: 04/06/2010date Of Correction: 05/14/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Add Comment about “Resident Assessment Deficiencies

cancel
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards.survey Date: 10/03/2011date Of Correction: 11/14/2011 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 08/25/2011date Of Correction: 10/06/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 08/05/2010date Of Correction: 09/10/2010 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 03/21/2011date Of Correction: 05/02/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 04/06/2010date Of Correction: 05/14/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards.survey Date: 04/06/2010date Of Correction: 05/14/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Add Comment about “Administration Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
29 %
vs   27 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
1.1 %
vs   1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
4 %
vs   14 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
5.2 %
vs   8.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
7.4 %
vs   7.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
54.8 %
vs   42.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
4.8 %
vs   1.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
3.5 %
vs   7.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
15.6 %
vs   2.20 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
1.3 %
vs   1.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
18.9 %
vs   13.6-28
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
66.3 %
vs   89.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
66.8 %
vs   90.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
5.2 %
vs   1.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
5.2 %
vs   2.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q1

cancel
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
28.1 %
vs   28.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
0.6 %
vs   0.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
5 %
vs   6.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
5.3 %
vs   10.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
7.1 %
vs   8.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
51.7 %
vs   37.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
4.8 %
vs   2.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
3.4 %
vs   4.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
10.1:1
vs   2.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
1.1 %
vs   2.20 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
5.1 %
vs   3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
22.2:1
vs   12.6:1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
54 %
vs   80.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
56.2 %
vs   87.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
18.1:1
vs   1.50 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q3

cancel

Compare ST JOSEPH'S MANOR CARE & REHABILITATION CENTER vs TORRINGTON HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER Nursing Homes USA


Scroll To Top

saved