VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > TORRINGTON HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER

TORRINGTON HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
TORRINGTON HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Torrington  vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have Torrington
State attribute explanation CT   vs 1.5% Nursing Homes USA have CT
Street 225 WYOMING AVE  
Zip Code 6790  
Phone 8604828563  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
126  (17.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
101  (9.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
80 % (3.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 8/25/2011  
Fire Survey Date 8/31/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 14  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
101  (9.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.59  (0.18 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.81  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.4  (0.19 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (5.46 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 02/10/2012
date Of Correction: 03/23/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/25/2011
date Of Correction: 10/06/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely.
survey Date: 12/04/2009
date Of Correction: 01/15/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 12/04/2009
date Of Correction: 01/15/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 07/30/2010
date Of Correction: 09/10/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 12/04/2009
date Of Correction: 01/15/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 08/25/2011
date Of Correction: 10/06/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 03/21/2011
date Of Correction: 05/02/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Let The Resident Or The Resident's Legal Representative The Right To Access Or Purchase Copies Of All Records.
survey Date: 03/21/2011
date Of Correction: 05/02/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 03/21/2011
date Of Correction: 05/02/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 12/04/2009
date Of Correction: 01/15/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 12/04/2009
date Of Correction: 01/15/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 08/25/2011
date Of Correction: 10/06/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 03/21/2011
date Of Correction: 05/02/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27 % (1.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1 % (31.95 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14 % (2.66 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.5 % (4.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.6 % (4.23 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
42.2 % (2.34 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.7 % (13.93 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.6 % (5.86 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.20 % (26.18 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.1 % (42.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.6-28 % (11.42 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.5 % (4.86 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
90.9 % (6.96 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.4 % (44.5 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1 % (13.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.5 % (3.11 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.7 % (23 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.5 % (7.6 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.9 % (1.68 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.7 % (0.2 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37.5 % (5.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1 % (8.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.6 % (4.98 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.3 % (17.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.20 % (36.33 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3 % (7.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 12.6:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.1 % (1.34 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
87.6 % (12.85 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.50 % (15.84 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved