VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > Comparison

Compare WEBSTER HEALTH SERVICES, INC VS CHOCTAW COUNTY NURSING CENTER
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 44 differences and 22 similarities between WEBSTER HEALTH SERVICES, INC, CHOCTAW COUNTY NURSING CENTER
 
General
City   Eupora vs   Ackerman  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “City”

State attribute explanation   Ms vs   Ms  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”

Street   70 Medical Plaza vs   311 West Cherry Street  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Street”

Zip Code   39,744 vs   39,735  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Zip Code”

Phone   6,622,586,221 vs   6,622,856,235  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Phone”

Overall Star Rating   
2
vs   2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”

Health Inspections Star Rating   
3
vs   1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”

Nurse Staffing Star Rating   
2
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”

Quality Measures Star Rating   
1
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”

RN Only Star Rating   
1
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”

Number of Certified Beds   
36
vs   60
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”

Total Number of Residents   
34
vs   60
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”

Percent of Occupied Beds   
94 %
vs   100 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”

Health Survey Date   12/21/2011 vs   3/23/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”

Fire Survey Date   12/21/2011 vs   3/20/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”

Sprinkler Status   Fully Sprinklered vs   Fully Sprinklered  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”

Program Participation   Medicaid vs   Medicaid  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Program Participation”

Type of Ownership   Non Profit - Corporation vs   For Profit - Individual  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”

Located Within a Hospital?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”

Multi Nursing Home Ownership?   Yes vs   Yes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”

Resident and Family Councils   Both vs   Both  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”

Continuing Care Retirement Community?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”

Quality Indicator Survey?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”

Special Focus Facility?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”

Civil Money Penalty Count   
75.2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”

Total Enforcement Actions Count   
75.2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”

# of deficiencies   
8
vs   8
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Add Comment about “General

cancel
Staff Information
Number of Residents   
34
vs   60
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Residents”

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.24
vs   0.65
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.22
vs   0.8
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.46
vs   1.46
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.01
vs   0.01
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.01
vs   0.01
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Add Comment about “Staff Information

cancel
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.survey Date: 08/12/2010date Of Correction: 08/24/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.survey Date: 05/05/2010date Of Correction: 05/11/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Mistreatment Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 04/08/2009date Of Correction: 04/24/2009 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential.survey Date: 04/08/2009date Of Correction: 04/24/2009 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Resident Rights Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.survey Date: 05/05/2010date Of Correction: 05/07/2010 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 03/15/2012date Of Correction: 04/05/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 05/05/2010date Of Correction: 06/25/2010 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 03/15/2012date Of Correction: 04/05/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 05/05/2010date Of Correction: 06/25/2010 vs   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 05/31/2011date Of Correction: 06/24/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Add Comment about “Quality Care Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 05/05/2010date Of Correction: 05/07/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Resident Assessment Deficiencies

cancel
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 03/15/2012date Of Correction: 04/05/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Give Or Get Quality Lab Services/tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents.survey Date: 03/15/2012date Of Correction: 04/05/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 10/28/2011date Of Correction: 11/15/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4    vs   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 05/31/2011date Of Correction: 06/24/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Add Comment about “Administration Deficiencies

cancel
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.survey Date: 10/28/2011date Of Correction: 11/15/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
30.3 %
vs   33.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain    vs   12.6:1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight    vs   3.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
7.6 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
17.6 %
vs   7.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms    vs   7.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
75.2 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
5.9 %
vs   3.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q1

cancel
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
30 %
vs   31.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
25.5 %
vs   13.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
3.2 %
vs   1.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
6.5 %
vs   7.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder    vs   37.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
7.6 %
vs   0.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
14.6 %
vs   6.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
75.2 %
vs   5.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
1 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
35.4 %
vs   22.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine    vs   95.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened    vs   96 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q3

cancel

Compare WEBSTER HEALTH SERVICES, INC vs CHOCTAW COUNTY NURSING CENTER Nursing Homes USA


Scroll To Top

saved