VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WEBSTER HEALTH SERVICES, INC

WEBSTER HEALTH SERVICES, INC

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WEBSTER HEALTH SERVICES, INC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 75.2 % 
City EUPORA   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have EUPORA
State attribute explanation MS   vs 1.3% Nursing Homes USA have MS
Street 70 MEDICAL PLAZA  
Zip Code 39744  
Phone 6622586221  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
36  (72.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
34  (57.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
94 % (10.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/21/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/21/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicaid  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
34  (57.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.24  (0.53 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.22  (0.38 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.46  (0.13 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.
survey Date: 08/12/2010
date Of Correction: 08/24/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.
survey Date: 05/05/2010
date Of Correction: 05/11/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 04/08/2009
date Of Correction: 04/24/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential.
survey Date: 04/08/2009
date Of Correction: 04/24/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 05/05/2010
date Of Correction: 05/07/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 05/05/2010
date Of Correction: 06/25/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 05/05/2010
date Of Correction: 06/25/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 05/05/2010
date Of Correction: 05/07/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.3 % (5.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.6 % (8.03 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
17.6 % (4.14 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.9 % (9.62 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30 % (4.61 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.5 % (11.4 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.2 % (6.02 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.5 % (2 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.6 % (3.05 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
14.6 % (5.02 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1 % (37.53 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
35.4 % (24.67 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %



Scroll To Top

saved