Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Columbia
vs
Cheraw
State attribute explanation
Sc
vs
Sc
Street
3001 Beechaven Road
vs
1150 State Road
Zip Code
29,204
vs
29,520
Phone
8,037,824,363
vs
8,435,372,060
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
3
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
120
vs
104
Total Number of Residents
110
vs
97
Percent of Occupied Beds
92 %
vs
93 %
Health Survey Date
11/2/2011
vs
4/21/2011
Fire Survey Date
11/3/2011
vs
4/21/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
vs
6
Staff Information
Number of Residents
110
vs
97
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.56
vs
0.5 - 2.0
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.24
vs
0.92
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.8
vs
1.42
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01
vs
0.01
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01
vs
0.01
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 04/21/2011date Of Correction: 05/18/2011
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 04/21/2011date Of Correction: 05/18/2011
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 04/21/2011date Of Correction: 05/18/2011
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Honor All Of The Resident's Rights As A Resident Of The Nursing Home, Free Of Coercion And Reprisal, And As A Citizen Or Resident Of The United States.survey Date: 04/21/2011date Of Correction: 05/18/2011
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give The Right Treatment And Services To Residents Who Have Mental Or Psychosocial Problems Adjusting.survey Date: 04/21/2011date Of Correction: 05/18/2011
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.survey Date: 04/21/2011date Of Correction: 05/18/2011
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27 %
vs
16.3:1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.5 %
vs
8.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.2 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.6 %
vs
11.7 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
46.3 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.9 %
vs
3.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13.5 %
vs
9.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
4.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
8.4 %
vs
6.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.5 %
vs
10 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
84.1 %
vs
93.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.2 %
vs
87.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9 %
vs
2.1 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27 %
vs
16.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.3 %
vs
7.1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.1 / 8.8
vs
4.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.2 %
vs
10.1:1
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
41.5 %
vs
68.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.2 %
vs
4.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.8 %
vs
8.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.9 %
vs
3.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
7.4 %
vs
6.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.50 %
vs
3.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.4 %
vs
14.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.4 %
vs
89.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
88.2 %
vs
78.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
18.7 %
vs
11.6:1
Compare WHITE OAK MANOR - COLUMBIA vs CHESTERFIELD CONVALESCENT CENTER Nursing Homes USA
cancel