VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CHESTERFIELD CONVALESCENT CENTER

CHESTERFIELD CONVALESCENT CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CHESTERFIELD CONVALESCENT CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City CHERAW   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have CHERAW
State attribute explanation SC   vs 1.2% Nursing Homes USA have SC
Street 1150 STATE ROAD  
Zip Code 29520  
Phone 8435372060  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
104  (4.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
97  (5.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
93 % (9.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/21/2011  
Fire Survey Date 4/21/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
97  (5.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.5 - 2.0  (0.27 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.92  (0.08 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.42  (0.17 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/21/2011
date Of Correction: 05/18/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 04/21/2011
date Of Correction: 05/18/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 04/21/2011
date Of Correction: 05/18/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Honor All Of The Resident's Rights As A Resident Of The Nursing Home, Free Of Coercion And Reprisal, And As A Citizen Or Resident Of The United States.
survey Date: 04/21/2011
date Of Correction: 05/18/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give The Right Treatment And Services To Residents Who Have Mental Or Psychosocial Problems Adjusting.
survey Date: 04/21/2011
date Of Correction: 05/18/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 04/21/2011
date Of Correction: 05/18/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 16.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.5 % (8.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.3 % (9.28 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.7 % (0.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.1 % (12.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.6 % (3.86 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.2 % (24.18 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.3 % (37.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10 % (15.02 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.3 % (8.66 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
87.1 % (3.16 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1 % (13.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.2 % (9.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.1 % (7 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.6 % (4.62 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 10.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
68.6 % (25.22 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.4 % (6.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.7 % (0.88 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.1 % (16.76 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.5 % (32.03 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.8 % (6.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.6 % (10.16 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.7 % (8.26 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
78.7 % (3.95 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 11.6:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved