VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ALDEN PRINCETON REHAB & HCC

ALDEN PRINCETON REHAB & HCC

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ALDEN PRINCETON REHAB & HCC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Chicago  vs 0.6% Nursing Homes USA have Chicago
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 255 WEST 69TH STREET  
Zip Code 60621  
Phone 7732245900  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
225  (116.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
166  (74.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
74 % (9.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/14/2012  
Fire Survey Date 3/29/2012  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
27  (19.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
166  (74.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.44  (0.33 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.65  (0.19 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.09  (0.5 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (5.46 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/20/2012
date Of Correction: 06/14/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 12/22/2010
date Of Correction: 02/15/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 12/22/2010
date Of Correction: 01/21/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/26/2010
date Of Correction: 02/24/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 11/09/2009
date Of Correction: 12/01/2009 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 10/14/2009
date Of Correction: 11/02/2009 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/04/2009
date Of Correction: 09/30/2009 

Deficiency #8 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/18/2009
date Of Correction: 09/30/2009 

Deficiency #9 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/30/2009
date Of Correction: 09/30/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 04/20/2012
date Of Correction: 06/14/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 08/04/2009
date Of Correction: 09/03/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 06/09/2009
date Of Correction: 09/03/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 04/30/2009
date Of Correction: 08/04/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 04/23/2010
date Of Correction: 05/05/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Or Get Specialized Rehabilitative Services Per The Patient's Assessment Or Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 12/22/2010
date Of Correction: 03/25/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 12/22/2010
date Of Correction: 02/15/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 12/22/2010
date Of Correction: 02/15/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 04/23/2010
date Of Correction: 05/05/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 01/07/2010
date Of Correction: 01/26/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 09/23/2009
date Of Correction: 09/30/2009 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 09/23/2009
date Of Correction: 09/30/2009 

Deficiency #8 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 09/10/2009
date Of Correction: 09/30/2009 

Deficiency #9 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 09/10/2009
date Of Correction: 09/30/2009 

Deficiency #10 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Or Get Specialized Rehabilitative Services Per The Patient's Assessment Or Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 08/04/2009
date Of Correction: 09/30/2009 

Deficiency #11 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Or Get Specialized Rehabilitative Services Per The Patient's Assessment Or Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 05/18/2009
date Of Correction: 09/30/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 08/04/2009
date Of Correction: 09/30/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 06/09/2009
date Of Correction: 09/30/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
31.4 (88.5) % (6.31 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.4 % (11.26 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.8 % (4.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2 % (9.83 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
13.6-28 % (30.94 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.1 % (12.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.6 % (21.42 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
24.2 % (60.44 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
41.4 % (42.54 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3 % (42.9 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.7 % (14.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.3 % (2.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.4 % (9.7 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
16.1 % (6.88 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.8 % (6.7 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
13.6-28 % (29.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.6 % (7.05 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.2 % (9.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.1 % (18.76 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.7 % (10.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.4 % (19.36 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
14.6 % (66.84 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
22.5 % (52.25 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 5.6:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved