ALFREDO GONZALEZ TEXAS STATE VETERANS HOME

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	MCALLEN	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have MCALLEN
State attribute explanation	TX	vs	7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX	compare TX Nursing Homes USA
Street	301 E YUMA AVE
Zip Code	78503
Phone	9566824224
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (2)
Quality Measures Star Rating	5 (1.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (5)
RN Only Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (1)
Number of Certified Beds	152 (43.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (152)
Total Number of Residents	152 (60.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (152)
Percent of Occupied Beds	100 % (16.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (100) %
Health Survey Date	6/30/2011
Fire Survey Date	6/29/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	Government - State	vs	0.9% Nursing Homes USA have Government - State	compare Government - State Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	6 (1.48 lower than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	150 (58.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.33 (0.44 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.77 (0.07 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.1 (0.49 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.02 (5.47 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.02 (0.08 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Has The Right To Have A Choice Over Activities, Their Schedules And Health Care According To His Or Her Interests, Assessment, And Plan Of Care. survey Date: 03/07/2012 date Of Correction: 07/01/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 03/07/2012 date Of Correction: 07/15/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Let The Resident Refuse Treatment Or Refuse To Take Part In An Experiment And Formulate Advance Directives. survey Date: 03/07/2012 date Of Correction: 07/01/2012

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life. survey Date: 03/07/2012 date Of Correction: 07/01/2012

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 03/07/2012 date Of Correction: 07/01/2012

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards. survey Date: 11/16/2011 date Of Correction: Not Available

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	28.8 % (3.71 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	1.7 % (14.96 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	6.7 % (5.88 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	7 % (4.83 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	31.7 % (12.84 % lower than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	0.7 % (14.93 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	7.7 % (5.76 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	10.7:1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	93.5 % (8.86 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	70.2 % (13.74 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.5 % (12.02 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	23 % (2.39 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.7 % (23 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	1.7 % (12.4 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	10.2 % (0.98 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	7.4 % (1.1 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	32.8 % (10.58 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	1.9 % (8.75 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	7.9:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	0.7 % (19.16 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.8 % (7.93 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	8.8 % (15.96 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	95.5 % (14.06 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	57.4 % (17.35 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	16.4 % (0.94 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %