VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ALL AMERICAN NURSING HOME

ALL AMERICAN NURSING HOME

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ALL AMERICAN NURSING HOME VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Number of Residents 75.2 % 
City Chicago  vs 0.6% Nursing Homes USA have Chicago
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 5448 NORTH BROADWAY STREET  
Zip Code 60640  
Phone 7733342224  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
144  (35.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
117  (25.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
81 % (2.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/30/2011  
Fire Survey Date 1/17/2012  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicaid  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
20  (12.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
117  (25.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.29  (0.48 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.43  (0.41 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.71  (0.88 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
75.2  (69.71 higher than average)
vs
5.49

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 12/10/2010
date Of Correction: 01/14/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure There Is A Pest Control Program To Prevent/deal With Mice, Insects, Or Other Pests.
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 04/20/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 04/20/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 12/10/2010
date Of Correction: 01/14/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 12/10/2010
date Of Correction: 01/14/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 07/06/2010
date Of Correction: 08/10/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 12/10/2010
date Of Correction: 01/14/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Give Or Get Specialized Rehabilitative Services Per The Patient's Assessment Or Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 12/10/2010
date Of Correction: 01/14/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 12/10/2010
date Of Correction: 05/10/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 12/10/2010
date Of Correction: 01/14/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 12/10/2010
date Of Correction: 01/14/2011 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Or Get Specialized Rehabilitative Services Per The Patient's Assessment Or Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 04/20/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Or Get Specialized Rehabilitative Services Per The Patient's Assessment Or Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 11/02/2009
date Of Correction: 12/04/2009 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 11/02/2009
date Of Correction: 12/04/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 12/10/2010
date Of Correction: 01/14/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 11/02/2009
date Of Correction: 12/04/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 12/10/2010
date Of Correction: 01/14/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Hire A Qualified Full-time Social Worker In A Facility With More Than 120 Beds.
survey Date: 11/02/2009
date Of Correction: 12/04/2009 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 12/10/2010
date Of Correction: 05/10/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Menus Meet The Resident's Nutritional Needs And That There Is A Prepared Menu By Which Nutritious Meals Have Been Planned For The Resident And Followed.
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 04/20/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.7 % (14.96 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
3.5 % (41.04 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5 % (20.02 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
25 % (59.64 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
17.9 (64.2) % (66.04 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.9 % (14.62 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
66.7 % (41.31 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.1 % (11 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (66.7 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
4.2 % (39.18 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.5 - 2.0 % (10.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.3 % (9.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.3 % (18.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.7 % (10.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.8 % (15.96 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
59.7 % (21.74 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
56.1 % (18.65 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %



Scroll To Top

saved