ALLIED SERVICES SKILLED NURSING CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	SCRANTON	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have SCRANTON
State attribute explanation	PA	vs	4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA	compare PA Nursing Homes USA
Street	303 SMALLACOMBE DRIVE
Zip Code	18501
Phone	5703481424
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	2 (0.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (2)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (3)
Quality Measures Star Rating	3 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (3)
RN Only Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (4)
Number of Certified Beds	371 (262.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (371)
Total Number of Residents	338 (246.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (338)
Percent of Occupied Beds	91 % (7.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (91) %
Health Survey Date	1/11/2012
Fire Survey Date	1/20/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	Non Profit - Corporation	vs	18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation	compare Non profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	Yes	vs	9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	1 (57.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	1 (55.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	14 (6.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	338 (246.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.07 (0.3 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.7 (0.14 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.77 (0.18 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.12 (5.37 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.12 (0.02 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 09/20/2010 date Of Correction: 11/29/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services. survey Date: 06/08/2010 date Of Correction: 07/21/2010

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment. survey Date: 06/22/2009 date Of Correction: 07/13/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 11/15/2010 date Of Correction: 11/29/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 04/21/2010 date Of Correction: 05/03/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident. survey Date: 05/28/2009 date Of Correction: 07/13/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 12/16/2010 date Of Correction: 02/07/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 11/15/2010 date Of Correction: 11/29/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function. survey Date: 09/20/2010 date Of Correction: 11/29/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses. survey Date: 05/28/2009 date Of Correction: 07/13/2009
Deficiency #5		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 05/28/2009 date Of Correction: 07/13/2009
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 05/18/2009 date Of Correction: 07/13/2009

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors. survey Date: 04/21/2010 date Of Correction: 05/03/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being. survey Date: 05/18/2009 date Of Correction: 07/13/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	17.5 % (7.59 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.9 % (32.05 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	11.9 % (4.76 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	8.2 % (4.38 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	3.3 % (8.53 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	41.6 % (2.94 % lower than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	7.1 % (8.53 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	6.5 % (6.96 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1.6 % (26.78 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	2.5 % (41.18 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	25.8 % (0.78 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	93.4 % (8.76 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	92.6 % (8.66 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	0.4 % (15.12 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	16.8 % (8.59 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.3 % (22.4 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	10.5 % (3.6 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	9.4 / 10.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	5.1 % (3.4 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	41.7 % (1.68 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	6.8 % (3.85 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	7.1 % (2.48 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	0.9 % (18.96 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1.8 % (36.73 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	0.6 % (10.13 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	29.2 % (4.44 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	93.6 % (12.16 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	90.8 % (16.05 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	15.1 % (2.24 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %