Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
ALPHA HOME ASSOC OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS INC | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
Staff Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Residents |
46 (45.38 lower than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.62 (0.15 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.44 (0.6 higher than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
2.06 (0.47 higher than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.05 (5.44 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.05 (0.05 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 02/01/2012 date Of Correction: 03/02/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Many level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services. survey Date: 10/26/2010 date Of Correction: 11/25/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely. survey Date: 02/17/2010 date Of Correction: 02/25/2010 |
Mistreatment Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 10/26/2010 date Of Correction: 11/25/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 10/26/2010 date Of Correction: 11/25/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 07/17/2009 date Of Correction: 08/16/2009 |
Resident Rights Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Has The Right To Have A Choice Over Activities, Their Schedules And Health Care According To His Or Her Interests, Assessment, And Plan Of Care. survey Date: 08/03/2011 date Of Correction: 08/22/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Each Resident In A Way That Keeps Or Builds The Resident's Quality Of Life. survey Date: 08/03/2011 date Of Correction: 08/22/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 02/17/2010 date Of Correction: 02/25/2010 |
Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function. survey Date: 02/01/2012 date Of Correction: 03/02/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 01/10/2012 date Of Correction: 02/09/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 02/17/2010 date Of Correction: 02/25/2010 |
Resident Assessment Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 02/01/2012 date Of Correction: 03/02/2012 |
Administration Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 07/17/2009 date Of Correction: 08/16/2009 |
Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
16.4 % (8.69 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.09 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
9.3 % (7.36 % lower than average)
|
vs |
16.66 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
19.5-24 % (6.92 % higher than average)
|
vs |
12.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
20.7 (69.3) % (8.87 % higher than average)
|
vs |
11.83 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
7.2 % (8.43 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.63 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
13.8 % (0.34 % higher than average)
|
vs |
13.46 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
5.1 % (23.28 % lower than average)
|
vs |
28.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
5 % (38.68 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
75.2 (29.3 higher than average)
|
vs |
45.90
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
1.7 % (13.82 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.52 %
|
Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
21.8 % (3.59 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
4 % (19.7 % lower than average)
|
vs |
23.70 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
9.6 % (4.5 % lower than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
15.1 % (5.88 % higher than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
13.2 % (4.7 % higher than average)
|
vs |
8.50 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
57.3 % (13.92 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
6.8 % (3.85 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 8.6:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
4.6 % (15.26 % lower than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
2.8 % (35.73 % lower than average)
|
vs |
38.53 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
17.7 % (6.97 % higher than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
21.9 % (2.86 % lower than average)
|
vs |
24.76 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
100 % (18.56 % higher than average)
|
vs |
81.44 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
95 % (20.25 % higher than average)
|
vs |
74.75 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
|
vs |
17.34 %
|