VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ALPHA HOME ASSOC OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS INC

ALPHA HOME ASSOC OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS INC

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ALPHA HOME ASSOC OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS INC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City INDIANAPOLIS   vs 0.3% Nursing Homes USA have INDIANAPOLIS
State attribute explanation IN   vs 3.1% Nursing Homes USA have IN
Street 2640 COLD SPRING RD  
Zip Code 46222  
Phone 3179231518  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
86  (22.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
63  (28.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
73 % (10.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/28/2011  
Fire Survey Date 5/10/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
14  (6.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
46  (45.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.62  (0.15 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.44  (0.6 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.06  (0.47 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (5.44 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 02/01/2012
date Of Correction: 03/02/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 10/26/2010
date Of Correction: 11/25/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely.
survey Date: 02/17/2010
date Of Correction: 02/25/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 10/26/2010
date Of Correction: 11/25/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 10/26/2010
date Of Correction: 11/25/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 07/17/2009
date Of Correction: 08/16/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Has The Right To Have A Choice Over Activities, Their Schedules And Health Care According To His Or Her Interests, Assessment, And Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 08/03/2011
date Of Correction: 08/22/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Each Resident In A Way That Keeps Or Builds The Resident's Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 08/03/2011
date Of Correction: 08/22/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 02/17/2010
date Of Correction: 02/25/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 02/01/2012
date Of Correction: 03/02/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 01/10/2012
date Of Correction: 02/09/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 02/17/2010
date Of Correction: 02/25/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 02/01/2012
date Of Correction: 03/02/2012 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 07/17/2009
date Of Correction: 08/16/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.4 % (8.69 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.3 % (7.36 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
19.5-24 % (6.92 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
20.7 (69.3) % (8.87 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.2 % (8.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13.8 % (0.34 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.1 % (23.28 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5 % (38.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7 % (13.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.8 % (3.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4 % (19.7 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.6 % (4.5 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
15.1 % (5.88 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.2 % (4.7 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
57.3 % (13.92 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.8 % (3.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 8.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.6 % (15.26 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.8 % (35.73 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
17.7 % (6.97 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.9 % (2.86 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (18.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95 % (20.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved