VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > AMBERWOOD GARDENS

AMBERWOOD GARDENS

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
AMBERWOOD GARDENS VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City SAN JOSE   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have SAN JOSE
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 1601 PETERSEN AVENUE  
Zip Code 95129  
Phone 4082537502  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
258  (149.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
227  (135.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
88 % (4.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/8/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/8/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 6  
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 75.2 % 
Staff Information
Number of Residents
227  (135.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.1  (0.33 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.89  (0.05 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.99  (0.4 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.14  (5.35 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.14  (0.04 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Help And Prepare Each Resident For A Safe And Easy Discharge And Transfer From The Nursing Home.
survey Date: 08/24/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 08/24/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 11/18/2009
date Of Correction: 12/10/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Activities To Meet The Interests And Needs Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 07/09/2009
date Of Correction: 08/14/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 03/09/2012
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 11/03/2009
date Of Correction: 01/19/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 17.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.5 % (1.84 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9 % (3.58 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.8 % (9.03 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
55.3 % (10.76 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4 % (11.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.5 % (7.96 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
7.3 % (36.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16 % (9.02 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.1 % (5.46 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
79.7 % (4.24 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7 % (12.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.6 (65.5) % (6.79 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.1 % (20.6 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 18.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 9.4 / 10.4 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.7 % (4.8 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
58.2 % (14.82 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.2 % (6.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.7 % (3.88 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
9.3 % (29.23 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.8 % (0.04 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.6 % (8.16 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
69.4 % (5.35 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 11.8:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved