VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > AMELIA MANOR NURSING HOME

AMELIA MANOR NURSING HOME

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
AMELIA MANOR NURSING HOME VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 75.2 % 
City LAFAYETTE   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have LAFAYETTE
State attribute explanation LA   vs 1.8% Nursing Homes USA have LA
Street 903 CENTER STREET  
Zip Code 70501  
Phone 3372347331  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
151  (42.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
107  (15.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
71 % (12.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 1/12/2012  
Fire Survey Date 1/11/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
107  (15.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.35  (0.42 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.65  (0.19 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.99  (0.6 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (5.45 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 08/19/2010
date Of Correction: 09/24/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 06/24/2010
date Of Correction: 08/01/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 02/09/2010
date Of Correction: 03/04/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 06/02/2011
date Of Correction: 07/17/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.
survey Date: 06/24/2010
date Of Correction: 08/01/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 06/24/2010
date Of Correction: 08/01/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 02/09/2010
date Of Correction: 03/29/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 06/02/2011
date Of Correction: 07/17/2011 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 06/24/2010
date Of Correction: 08/01/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.5 % (5.41 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.7 % (26.25 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.6 % (7.06 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 12.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.9 % (4.93 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.8 % (17.74 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.8 % (11.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.8 % (2.66 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.9 % (26.48 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
85.7 % (1.76 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9 % (13.62 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.8 % (5.41 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.4 % (19.3 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.2 % (3.9 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.5 % (0.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.1 % (1.4 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.8 % (16.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4 % (6.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.1 % (2.48 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.3 % (16.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9 % (7.83 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
33.3 % (8.54 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
65.7 % (15.74 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
71.8 % (2.95 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved