VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > APEX SECURE CARE BROWNFIELD

APEX SECURE CARE BROWNFIELD

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
APEX SECURE CARE BROWNFIELD VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 1 % 
City BROWNFIELD   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have BROWNFIELD
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 1101 E LAKE ST  
Zip Code 79316  
Phone 8066377561  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
94  (14.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
88  (3.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
94 % (10.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/10/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/10/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(53.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
14  (6.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
88  (3.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.39  (0.38 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.61  (0.23 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.99  (0.6 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (5.46 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/10/2012
date Of Correction: 06/01/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 02/06/2011
date Of Correction: 04/01/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Comfortable And Safe Temperature Levels.
survey Date: 12/08/2009
date Of Correction: 02/24/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 05/10/2012
date Of Correction: 06/01/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 05/10/2012
date Of Correction: 06/01/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 02/06/2011
date Of Correction: 04/01/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 02/06/2011
date Of Correction: 04/01/2011 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 07/19/2010
date Of Correction: 08/19/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 07/19/2010
date Of Correction: 08/19/2010 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 05/17/2010
date Of Correction: 06/17/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 12/08/2009
date Of Correction: 03/01/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Honor All Of The Resident's Rights As A Resident Of The Nursing Home, Free Of Coercion And Reprisal, And As A Citizen Or Resident Of The United States.
survey Date: 12/08/2009
date Of Correction: 03/01/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Use A Registered Nurse At Least 8 Hours A Day, 7 Days A Week.
survey Date: 02/06/2011
date Of Correction: 04/01/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 02/06/2011
date Of Correction: 04/01/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
83.3 % (58.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.6 % (6.94 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.5 % (12.04 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.9 % (7.56 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
14.8 % (13.58 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.6 % (37.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
33.3 % (8.28 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.9 % (6.26 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
85.7 % (1.76 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9 % (12.62 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
81.9 % (56.51 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.6 % (10.5 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.9 % (5.32 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.4 % (7.1 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
36.2 % (7.18 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (64.55 % higher than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
14.4 % (5.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.2 % (34.33 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.2 % (6.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
35.1 % (10.34 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.8 % (10.36 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
19.5-24 % (55.25 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %



Scroll To Top

saved