VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ARBORS AT FAIRMONT

ARBORS AT FAIRMONT

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ARBORS AT FAIRMONT VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City FAIRMONT   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have FAIRMONT
State attribute explanation WV   vs 0.8% Nursing Homes USA have WV
Street 130 KAUFMAN DRIVE  
Zip Code 26554  
Phone 3043635633  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
112  (20.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
93 % (9.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/4/2010  
Fire Survey Date 3/16/2010  
Sprinkler Status Missing/no Data  vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have Missing/No Data
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(3.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
112  (20.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.36  (0.41 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.9  (0.06 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.26  (0.33 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (5.43 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/12/2010
date Of Correction: 10/06/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 07/27/2009
date Of Correction: 08/12/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 05/14/2009
date Of Correction: 06/23/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Post Nurse Staffing Information/data On A Daily Basis.
survey Date: 07/27/2009
date Of Correction: 08/12/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24 % (1.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.5 % (2.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.6 % (20.1 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.2 % (1.9 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.6 % (2.62 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.3 % (0.2 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40.4 % (2.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4 % (6.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
19.3 % (9.72 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4 % (15.86 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.5 % (33.03 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.5 % (5.23 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
33.3 % (8.54 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.5 % (8.06 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
90.6 % (15.85 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
20.4 % (3.06 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved