ARLINGTON HILLS HEALTHCARE CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	SALT LAKE CITY	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have SALT LAKE CITY
State attribute explanation	UT	vs	0.6% Nursing Homes USA have UT	compare UT Nursing Homes USA
Street	165 SOUTH 1000 EAST
Zip Code	84102
Phone	8013225521
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	2 (1.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (2)
RN Only Star Rating	5 (1.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (5)
Number of Certified Beds	108 (0.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (108)
Total Number of Residents	55 (36.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (55)
Percent of Occupied Beds	51 % (32.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (51) %
Health Survey Date	11/18/2010
Fire Survey Date	11/17/2010
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	17 (9.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	55 (36.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.17 (0.4 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.42 (0.42 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.59 (equals average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.1 (5.39 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.1 (equals average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 01/03/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 01/03/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 12/03/2009 date Of Correction: 12/30/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 01/03/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 01/03/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential. survey Date: 04/01/2009 date Of Correction: 04/24/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 01/03/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 12/03/2009 date Of Correction: 12/30/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Doctors Visit Residents Regularly, As Required. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 01/03/2011

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Or Get Quality Lab Services/tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 01/03/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Or Get X-rays And Other Tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents. survey Date: 12/03/2009 date Of Correction: 12/30/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Medically Necessary Lab Services/tests Are Ordered By The Attending Physician. survey Date: 12/03/2009 date Of Correction: 12/30/2009

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 01/03/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep The Rate Of Medication Errors (wrong Drug, Wrong Dose, Wrong Time) To Less Than 5%. survey Date: 04/01/2009 date Of Correction: 04/24/2009

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Offer Other Nutritional Food To Each Resident Who Will Not Eat The Food Served. survey Date: 08/04/2011 date Of Correction: 08/26/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Menus Meet The Resident's Nutritional Needs And That There Is A Prepared Menu By Which Nutritious Meals Have Been Planned For The Resident And Followed. survey Date: 08/04/2011 date Of Correction: 08/26/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 01/03/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	14 % (11.09 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	27.4 % (10.74 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	3.3 % (9.28 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	6.1 % (5.73 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	22.6 % (21.94 % lower than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	10.2 % (5.43 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	11.8:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	14.6 % (13.78 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	2 % (41.68 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	44.4 % (19.38 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	74.5 % (10.14 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	82.1 % (1.84 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	7.7 % (38.2 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.9 % (11.62 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	16.7 % (8.69 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	36.3 % (22.2 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	5.4 % (3.82 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	5.5 % (3 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	24.2 % (19.18 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	8.8 % (1.85 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	11.3 % (1.72 % higher than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	10.6 % (9.26 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1.3 % (37.23 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	5.3 % (5.43 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	42.9 % (18.14 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	81.7 % (0.26 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	80.8 % (6.05 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	7.9:1 %