VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ARTMAN LUTHERAN HOME

ARTMAN LUTHERAN HOME

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ARTMAN LUTHERAN HOME VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City AMBLER   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have AMBLER
State attribute explanation PA   vs 4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA
Street 250 NORTH BETHLEHEM PIKE  
Zip Code 19002  
Phone 2156436333  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
61  (47.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
59  (32.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
97 % (13.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/14/2011  
Fire Survey Date 10/14/2011  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(6.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
59  (32.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.96  (0.19 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.51  (0.33 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.47  (0.12 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.18  (5.31 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.18  (0.08 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 10/14/2011
date Of Correction: 11/22/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.6 % (3.51 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4 % (28.95 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.8 % (2.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.8 % (2.03 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.3 % (11.33 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
14.3 % (14.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14 % (11.02 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (15.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.3 % (13.36 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.4 % (13.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.5 % (3.11 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.7 % (18 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.6 % (10.5 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6 % (3.22 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.5 % (2 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2 % (8.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3 % (6.58 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.5 % (12.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.7 % (7.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.5 % (12.26 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98 % (16.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.8 % (22.05 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
28.9 % (11.56 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved