Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
ASBURY HEALTH CENTER | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
Staff Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Residents |
125 (33.62 higher than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.9 (0.13 higher than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.01 (0.17 higher than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.91 (0.32 higher than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.05 (5.44 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.05 (0.05 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 12/15/2010 date Of Correction: 02/07/2011 |
Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function. survey Date: 09/29/2009 date Of Correction: 11/15/2009 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 09/29/2009 date Of Correction: 11/15/2009 |
Resident Assessment Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 12/15/2010 date Of Correction: 02/07/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 08/04/2009 date Of Correction: 09/28/2009 |
Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication | 21.2:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
2.20 % (30.75 % lower than average)
|
vs |
32.95 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
4.3 % (12.36 % lower than average)
|
vs |
16.66 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
5.7 % (6.88 % lower than average)
|
vs |
12.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
9.1 % (2.73 % lower than average)
|
vs |
11.83 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
92.2 % (47.66 % higher than average)
|
vs |
44.54 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder | 2.6 / 3 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
3.6 % (9.86 % lower than average)
|
vs |
13.46 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms | 11.6:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain | 15.9:1 % | ||||
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
86.7 % (2.06 % higher than average)
|
vs |
84.64 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
78.2 % (5.74 % lower than average)
|
vs |
83.94 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
4.5 % (41.4 % lower than average)
|
vs |
45.90 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
2.7 % (12.82 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.52 %
|
Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
21.7 % (3.69 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased | 2.6 / 3 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
6.2 % (7.9 % lower than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
4.9 % (4.32 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
11.5 % (3 % higher than average)
|
vs |
8.50 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
89.9 % (46.52 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
2.9 % (7.75 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
1.50 % (8.08 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
6.5 % (13.36 % lower than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
|
vs |
38.53 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury | 2.6 / 3 % | ||||
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
22.3 % (2.46 % lower than average)
|
vs |
24.76 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
83.5 % (2.06 % higher than average)
|
vs |
81.44 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
80.3 % (5.55 % higher than average)
|
vs |
74.75 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
3.7 % (13.64 % lower than average)
|
vs |
17.34 %
|