VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ASBURY PARK NURSING & REHAB

ASBURY PARK NURSING & REHAB

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ASBURY PARK NURSING & REHAB VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City SACRAMENTO   vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have SACRAMENTO
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 2257 FAIR OAKS BLVD.  
Zip Code 95825  
Phone 9166492000  
Overall Star Rating
(1.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
139  (30.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
96  (4.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
69 % (14.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 9/2/2011  
Fire Survey Date 9/7/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

Staff Information
Number of Residents
96  (4.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.02  (0.25 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.21  (0.37 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.23  (0.64 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.16  (5.33 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.16  (0.06 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.8 % (11.29 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.3 % (10.36 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.1 % (3.48 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.9 % (9.73 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.4 % (12.06 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
12 % (16.38 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 17.8:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (15.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.2 % (11.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.2 % (1.02 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1 % (7.5 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
48.3 % (4.92 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6 % (4.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3 % (6.58 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
16.9-24 % (2.96 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (64.47 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.1 % (13.66 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (18.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (25.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
15.1 % (2.24 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved