VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ASBURY TOWERS RETIREMENT COMMUNITY

ASBURY TOWERS RETIREMENT COMMUNITY

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ASBURY TOWERS RETIREMENT COMMUNITY VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City GREENCASTLE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have GREENCASTLE
State attribute explanation IN   vs 3.1% Nursing Homes USA have IN
Street 102 W POPLAR ST  
Zip Code 46135  
Phone 7656535148  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
48  (60.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
46  (45.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
96 % (12.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/9/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/28/2011  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Church Related  vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Church related
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
46  (45.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.56  (0.21 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.42  (0.58 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.98  (0.39 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.12  (5.37 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.12  (0.02 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 07/24/2009
date Of Correction: 08/21/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 07/24/2009
date Of Correction: 08/21/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 07/24/2009
date Of Correction: 08/21/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 07/24/2009
date Of Correction: 08/21/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Or Get Quality Lab Services/tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents.
survey Date: 02/10/2011
date Of Correction: 02/18/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 07/24/2009
date Of Correction: 08/21/2009 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 02/10/2011
date Of Correction: 02/18/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 07/24/2009
date Of Correction: 08/21/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.7 (74.7) % (1.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.7 % (30.25 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.2 % (9.38 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
27 % (15.17 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
9.8 % (5.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
24.3 % (10.84 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
36 % (10.98 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.8 % (12.16 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
61.8 % (22.14 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 2.6 / 3 % 
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.2 % (0.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.20 % (21.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.3 % (4.92 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
16.8 % (8.3 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
61.9 % (18.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 7.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
23 % (13.42 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.5 % (16.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.7 % (36.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.3 % (6.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.3 % (4.46 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.5 % (6.06 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
71.1 % (3.65 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved