AVANTE AT BOCA RATON, INC.

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	BOCA RATON	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have BOCA RATON
State attribute explanation	FL	vs	4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL	compare FL Nursing Homes USA
Street	1130 NW 15TH STREET
Zip Code	33486
Phone	5613946282
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (3)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (2)
Number of Certified Beds	144 (35.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (144)
Total Number of Residents	113 (21.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (113)
Percent of Occupied Beds	78 % (5.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (78) %
Health Survey Date	3/30/2012
Fire Survey Date	3/27/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	4 (54.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	4 (52.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	19

Staff Information
Number of Residents	113 (21.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.54 (0.23 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.3 (0.46 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.84 (0.25 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.11 (5.38 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.11 (0.01 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 06/21/2011 date Of Correction: 07/21/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 10/19/2010 date Of Correction: 11/03/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public. survey Date: 07/08/2010 date Of Correction: 08/06/2010

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 01/30/2012 date Of Correction: 04/27/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 09/08/2011 date Of Correction: 10/06/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 11/01/2011 date Of Correction: 11/01/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 10/27/2011 date Of Correction: 12/22/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 10/27/2011 date Of Correction: 12/22/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 10/19/2010 date Of Correction: 11/03/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 05/27/2010 date Of Correction: 06/27/2010
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 05/27/2010 date Of Correction: 06/27/2010
Deficiency #7		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 05/27/2010 date Of Correction: 06/27/2010
Deficiency #8		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 12/17/2009 date Of Correction: 02/18/2010

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action. survey Date: 01/30/2012 date Of Correction: 04/27/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 10/27/2011 date Of Correction: 12/22/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 09/08/2011 date Of Correction: 10/06/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Quickly Tell The Resident's Doctor The Results Of Lab Tests. survey Date: 06/21/2011 date Of Correction: 07/21/2011

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards. survey Date: 01/30/2012 date Of Correction: 03/01/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 10/27/2011 date Of Correction: 12/22/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	14.1 % (10.99 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.7 % (32.25 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	6.6 % (10.06 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	8.1 / 8.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	15.6 % (3.77 % higher than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	7.9:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	3.8 % (9.66 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	9.1 % (15.92 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	84.6 % (0.04 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	86.6 % (2.66 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.3 % (14.22 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	16.3:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.8 % (22.9 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	10.5 % (3.6 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	4.9 % (4.32 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	8.2 % (0.3 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	36 % (7.38 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	9.2 % (1.45 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	1.3 % (8.28 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.3 % (9.43 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	18.7 % (6.06 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	83.9 % (2.46 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	87.6 % (12.85 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	20.3 % (2.96 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %