VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > AVENUE CARE NURSING & REHAB CTR

AVENUE CARE NURSING & REHAB CTR

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
AVENUE CARE NURSING & REHAB CTR VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Chicago  vs 0.6% Nursing Homes USA have Chicago
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 4505 SOUTH DREXEL  
Zip Code 60653  
Phone 7732850550  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
155  (46.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
119  (27.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
77 % (6.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 1/13/2012  
Fire Survey Date 1/13/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
119  (27.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.33  (0.44 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.6  (0.24 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.93  (0.66 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (5.44 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/31/2012
date Of Correction: 05/31/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 08/11/2010
date Of Correction: 10/06/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 05/21/2010
date Of Correction: 06/09/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/07/2009
date Of Correction: 08/26/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/21/2009
date Of Correction: 05/08/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 06/30/2010
date Of Correction: 07/23/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/04/2012
date Of Correction: 05/04/2012 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Keep Clinical Record Information Safe, So That It Will Not Be Lost, Destroyed Or Used By The Wrong Person.
survey Date: 08/11/2010
date Of Correction: 10/06/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.
survey Date: 06/30/2010
date Of Correction: 07/23/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.9 % (6.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.1 % (29.85 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.8 % (11.86 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
20.2 (68.4) % (8.37 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder 12.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.2 % (10.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.9 % (12.56 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.5 % (24.88 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.9 (55.2) % (12.12 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
16.4 % (68.24 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
15.7 % (68.24 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8 % (13.72 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.9 % (2.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.1 % (22.6 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.5 % (11.6 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
13.3 % (4.08 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
19.7 % (11.2 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder 12.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.5 % (6.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.6 % (8.98 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.7 % (16.16 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4 % (9.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 12.3:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
15.5 % (65.94 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 13.1:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
7.1 % (10.24 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved