Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
BADGER PRAIRIE HCC | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
Staff Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Residents |
115 (23.62 higher than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.04 (0.27 higher than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.45 (0.39 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.49 (0.1 lower than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.05 (5.44 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.05 (0.05 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 10/21/2010 date Of Correction: 11/19/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 05/20/2009 date Of Correction: 06/15/2009 |
Mistreatment Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 05/20/2009 date Of Correction: 06/12/2009 |
Resident Assessment Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 07/15/2009 date Of Correction: 08/08/2009 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 05/20/2009 date Of Correction: 06/12/2009 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 05/20/2009 date Of Correction: 06/12/2009 |
Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
62.3 % (37.21 % higher than average)
|
vs |
25.09 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
24.4 % (7.74 % higher than average)
|
vs |
16.66 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
5 % (7.58 % lower than average)
|
vs |
12.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
4.5 % (7.33 % lower than average)
|
vs |
11.83 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
29.8 % (14.74 % lower than average)
|
vs |
44.54 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
9.3 % (6.33 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.63 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
3.6 % (9.86 % lower than average)
|
vs |
13.46 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
9 % (19.38 % lower than average)
|
vs |
28.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
2.7 % (40.98 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
2.7 % (12.82 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.52 %
|
Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
60.9 % (35.51 % higher than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
|
vs |
23.70 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
23.4 % (9.3 % higher than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
6.1 % (3.12 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
5 % (3.5 % lower than average)
|
vs |
8.50 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
33.8 % (9.58 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
6.5 % (4.15 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
4.4 % (5.18 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
6 % (13.86 % lower than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
4.1 % (34.43 % lower than average)
|
vs |
38.53 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
16.2 % (5.47 % higher than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
43.7 % (18.94 % higher than average)
|
vs |
24.76 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
77.8 % (3.64 % lower than average)
|
vs |
81.44 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
88.7 % (13.95 % higher than average)
|
vs |
74.75 %
|